Test and Item Response Theories and School Environment as Assessment Practice Factors among Science and Mathematics Teachers in Secondary Schools in Eastern Uganda

Author:

Manyiraho Deborah1,Zami Atibuni Dennis1,Kani Olema David2

Affiliation:

1. Busitema University, Uganda

2. University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park Kingsway, South Africa

Abstract

This study sought to establish the effect of knowledge of the Classical Test Theory (CTT) and Item Response Theory (IRT) and school assessment environment on assessment practice among teachers of science and mathematics subjects in Eastern Uganda Secondary Schools. The study assessed the levels of knowledge and application of CTT and IRT in assessment, examined the suitability of school environment for assessment and established the influence of school environment and knowledge of CTT and IRT on teachers’ engagement in assessment. A census of 307 teachers of science and mathematics subjects attending SESEMAT training in Eastern Uganda participated in the study. The results revealed that the teachers were engaged in assessment (M = 17.04, SD = 2.00) and had moderate levels of knowledge of CTT (M = 10.19, SD = 2.23) and IRT (M = 17.5, SD = 3.50). Their levels of application of CTT (M = 28.08, SD = 3.85) and IRT (M = 6.86, SD = 1.47) were also moderate. The teachers reported that their schools had somewhat conducive environments for assessment (M = 14.37, SD = 3.44). In addition, school environment affected teachers assessment practices most ( = .211, t = 7.212, p < .05), knowledge of CTT also influenced teachers assessment practice, but less than the influence by environment ( = .112, t = 4.969, p < .05). In conclusion, enhancing the levels of knowledge and application of CTT and IRT as well as improving school assessment environment are paramount for meaningful engagement in assessment by teachers. The study recommended pre-service and in-service training of the teachers in CTT and IRT in addition to schools improving environments for effective teacher engagement and quality assessment.

Publisher

Gitoya Centre for Academic Research and Dissemination

Reference21 articles.

1. Akwei, I. (2017). Poor performance in science: Ugandan education minister blames teachers. Africa News. www.africanews.com

2. An, X., & Yung, Y. (2014). Item response theory: What it is and how you can use the IRT procedure to apply it. Paper SAS 364-2014.https://support.sas.com/resources/pap ers/proceedings14/SAS364-2014.pdf

3. Baird, J. A., & Black, P. (2013). Test theories, educational priorities and reliability of public examinations in England. Research Papers in Education, 28(1), 5-21.https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2012.754224

4. Clark, R., Freedberg, M., Hazeltine, E., & Voss, M. W. (2015). Are there age-related differences in the ability to learn configural responses? PLoS One https://doi:10.1371/ journal.pone.0137260

5. Conejo, R., Guzmán, E., & Trella, M. (2016). The SIETTE automatic assessment environment. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26(1), 270-292.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3