Mediating knowledge construction: Towards a dynamic model of assessment and learning

Author:

Jensen Mogens R.

Abstract

AbstractIn the United States the extent of the need for new thinking and new approaches to all of education is underscored by the prevalence of inadequate student achievement and preparation across the nation. In the most recent National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 68 per cent of the nation’s 4th graders scored below proficient in reading (US Department of Education, 2001a) and 74 per cent scored below proficient in math (US Department of Education, 2001b) – with higher rates of failure among Latino and Black students, students in inner cities, and students living in poverty. In response to these kinds of results, and the emergence of a knowledge economy, the National Education Goals Panel (1991) have long called for ‘fundamental changes in our education system [to enable people] to think for a living, adapt to changing environments [and] continually learn and develop new skills’ (p.1). When fields are in crisis – as for many is the case with education – philosophers of science advocate an examination of their underlying paradigms. The aim is to rethink premises that may enable scientists and practitioners to ask new questions, construct new theories, design, implement and research new programmes, and achieve better results. This paper presents one attempt to do that in education. It draws principally on advances in the cognitive and learning sciences to secure a philosophical paradigm and a theoretical foundation to guide the efforts of programme developers, educators, parents, administrators and policy makers to help all students achieve higher academic standards while learning how to learn.

Publisher

British Psychological Society

Reference37 articles.

1. Boyer, E. R. (1995). The basic school: A community for learning. Princeton, NJ: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

2. Brooks, J. G. & Brooks, M. G. (1993). In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

3. Bruer, J. T. (1993). Schools for thought: A science of learning in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

4. Caine, R. N. & Caine, G. C. (1991). Making connections: Teaching and the human brain. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

5. Costa, A. L. & Liebmann, R. M. (1997). Envisioning process as content: Toward a renaissance curriculum. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3