A case study on the use of group supervision with learning mentors

Author:

Soni Anita

Abstract

Aim:This research examined the views of learning mentors on the outcomes of group supervision, the enablers and barriers to attending and the key characteristics of groups who might benefit from group supervision.Methods:The group has been running for approximately three years. Case study methodology was employed to evaluate the group supervision, using the following methods: a focus group, review of the written records of attendance and content of the sessions, and questionnaires evaluating the sessions after a year.Findings:The study identified the educative function (Hawkins & Shohet, 2006) as dominant within the group supervision sessions and the managerial function least evident. It highlighted that the content related most frequently to children, the learning mentors’ own role and the sharing of materials. The findings illustrate the importance of managers being supportive of group supervision in order to enable attendance. The relatively isolated role of learning mentors in schools is a key characteristic as to why this professional group benefits from group supervision.Limitations:The research examined a single case study based on a small sample, and would have been strengthened through use of individual interviews, and including the views of those who commissioned the sessions.Conclusions:This study identified the dominance of the educative function in the group supervision of learning mentors, the importance of management support and the content most frequently discussed in the sessions.

Publisher

British Psychological Society

Subject

Developmental and Educational Psychology

Reference51 articles.

1. Learning Mentors Eight Years on: Still Removing Barriers to Learning?

2. Experiences of group culture and patterns of interaction in psychotherapy supervision groups;Boëthius;The Clinical Supervisor,2004

3. Consultation groups: Participants’ views;Bozic;Educational Psychology in Practice,2002

4. British Psychological Society (BPS) (2009). Code of ethics and conduct. Retrieved 31 August 2014, from: http://www.bps.org.uk.

5. Empowering learning support assistants to enhance the emotional well-being of children in school;Burton;Educational & Child Psychology,2008

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3