Exploring the training experiences of trainee educational psychologists in supporting children and young people with literacy difficulties

Author:

Maries-Collier Freya,Woods Kevin

Abstract

AimsThis research aims to build a national picture of the range of training that trainee educational psychologists (TEPs) in England receive in relation to literacy difficulties and/or dyslexia (LitD/D), and how this goes on to influence their professional practice.Method/RationaleThe practice of educational psychologists (EPs) in working with children and young people with LitD/D has been described as inconsistent, as different EP services use different definitions, policies and diagnostic pathways. A lack of consensus in knowledge and practice may have negative implications for the principle of equality of access and the positioning of EPs as evidence-based practitioners. Focus groups were held across five universities, with 24 TEPs in their second or final year of the three-year professional doctorate training programme taking part. Transcripts were analysed thematically.FindingsTEPs’ training and professional experiences varied, with some perceiving that identifying and supporting children with LitD/D was not indicated as a priority concern in their practice placements.LimitationsThis was an exploratory study, which may limit the transferability of findings. However, the range of patterning of views and variation of opinions discussed by the participants suggest that a fair representation of TEPs’ experiences and perceptions was captured through the focus groups.ConclusionsConsidering TEPs acknowledged a desire to feel more competent in supporting children with LitD/D, there are implications for the content and approach of training programmes, and a need for more a directive role for professional legislation.

Publisher

British Psychological Society

Subject

Developmental and Educational Psychology

Reference40 articles.

1. Association of Educational Psychologists (2020). Training to become an Educational Psychologist in England. https://www.aep.org.uk/training/

2. Bhaskar, R. (2008). A realist theory of science. Routledge.

3. Bodkin, H. (2019, November 1). Dyslexia no longer being diagnosed by councils who called the disorder ‘scientifically questionable.’ The Telegraph. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/01/11/dyslexia-no-longer-diagnosed-councils-called-disorder-scientifically/

4. Exploring stigmatisation among people diagnosed with either bipolar disorder or borderline personality disorder: A critical realist analysis;Bonnington;Social Science & Medicine,2014

5. Using thematic analysis in psychology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3