Author:
Maries-Collier Freya,Woods Kevin
Abstract
AimsThis research aims to build a national picture of the range of training that trainee educational psychologists (TEPs) in England receive in relation to literacy difficulties and/or dyslexia (LitD/D), and how this goes on to influence their professional practice.Method/RationaleThe practice of educational psychologists (EPs) in working with children and young people with LitD/D has been described as inconsistent, as different EP services use different definitions, policies and diagnostic pathways. A lack of consensus in knowledge and practice may have negative implications for the principle of equality of access and the positioning of EPs as evidence-based practitioners. Focus groups were held across five universities, with 24 TEPs in their second or final year of the three-year professional doctorate training programme taking part. Transcripts were analysed thematically.FindingsTEPs’ training and professional experiences varied, with some perceiving that identifying and supporting children with LitD/D was not indicated as a priority concern in their practice placements.LimitationsThis was an exploratory study, which may limit the transferability of findings. However, the range of patterning of views and variation of opinions discussed by the participants suggest that a fair representation of TEPs’ experiences and perceptions was captured through the focus groups.ConclusionsConsidering TEPs acknowledged a desire to feel more competent in supporting children with LitD/D, there are implications for the content and approach of training programmes, and a need for more a directive role for professional legislation.
Publisher
British Psychological Society
Subject
Developmental and Educational Psychology
Reference40 articles.
1. Association of Educational Psychologists (2020). Training to become an Educational Psychologist in England. https://www.aep.org.uk/training/
2. Bhaskar, R. (2008). A realist theory of science. Routledge.
3. Bodkin, H. (2019, November 1). Dyslexia no longer being diagnosed by councils who called the disorder ‘scientifically questionable.’ The Telegraph. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/01/11/dyslexia-no-longer-diagnosed-councils-called-disorder-scientifically/
4. Exploring stigmatisation among people diagnosed with either bipolar disorder or borderline personality disorder: A critical realist analysis;Bonnington;Social Science & Medicine,2014
5. Using thematic analysis in psychology