Eliciting and integrating views of children and families within the work of youth justice services: What can educational psychologists contribute?

Author:

Howarth-Lees Danielle,Woods Kevin

Abstract

This study aims to explore why and how the views of others are elicited and integrated within youth justice work, and how educational psychologists (EPs) may support this. Article 12 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) (United Nations, 1989) highlights the right for all children and young people to express their views, thoughts and feelings on issues affecting them and for these views to be seriously considered.Youth justice services work within a ‘child first’ principle and upholding of this is partly achieved through the elicitation and integration of children’s views. Similar to this, EPs aim to ensure participation and advocacy is integral to their own work. Their experiences of working across a wide age and developmental range means EPs are well placed in eliciting and integrating views from a diverse range of groups. Semi-structured interviews with staff from two English youth justice services are used, albeit both services did not have any prior experience of educational psychology services. Thematic analysis of data identifies three global themes addressing the facilitators and barriers of eliciting and integrating views, as well as how youth justice professionals view EPs supporting them in their work.The paper concludes that there is scope within the EP role for supporting youth justice services. Future research could identify how different youth service roles might differentially utilise educational psychology service.

Publisher

British Psychological Society

Subject

Developmental and Educational Psychology

Reference61 articles.

1. Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research

2. Barry, M. & McNeill, F. (Eds.) (2009). Youth offending and youth justice. London: Jessica Kingsley.

3. Every child matters: Can educational psychology contribute to radical reform?

4. Bhaskar, R. (2008). A realist theory of science. Oxon: Routledge.

5. Using thematic analysis in psychology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3