Parents of children with special educational needs: Ethical issues in partnerships and power

Author:

Bennett Peter Lloyd

Abstract

This article focuses on professional relationships with parents of children with special educational needs. It is argued that the legislative framework for special educational needs which appropriately makes professional practices accountable to parents also results in focusing on individual children and can encourage parents to adopt adversarial approaches. A small sample of educational psychologists’ views regarding their experiences of advocacy resulting in children gaining access to resources beyond the level required by their special educational needs is reported. The author concludes that the results suggest that parents who co-operate in developing positive relationships with professionals are likely to achieve more successful outcomes for their children than parents who adopt an adversarial viewpoint.

Publisher

British Psychological Society

Reference18 articles.

1. Beeson, M. (1995). Munchausen syndrome by proxy. Psychiatry in Practice, May/June, 17–20.

2. Cabinet Office (1991). Citizen’s Charter: raising the standard. London: HMSO.

3. The impact of the Special Educational Needs Tribunal on Local Education Authorities’ Policy and Planning for Special Educational Needs

4. Faupel, A. (1994). Psychological assessment of children with emotional and behavioural difficulties. Address to Avon Psychology Service.

5. Compliance with treatment in asthma and Munchausen syndrome by proxy;Godding;Archives of Disease in Childhood,1991

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3