Clients’ experience of research within a research clinic setting

Author:

Stone Clare,Elliott Robert

Abstract

AimThis study explored the impact that the research process has on individual clients and their progress in therapy.MethodThis was a relatively small-scale qualitative study (N=17). The data consisted of an archive of semistructured interviews from a university-based psychotherapy research clinic that were analysed using a version of grounded theory analysis.FindingsSome clients described as helpful the use of questionnaires, particularly the Personal Questionnaire (PQ) and Helpful Aspects of Therapy (HAT) Form, and the Qualitative Change Interview. Research procedures reported by other clients included the use of recording equipment, questionnaires (particularly the HAT Form), and interviews. The meaning that the research process had for clients was also considered, and provided evidence for a ‘moral trade-off’ experienced by participants.DiscussionThere appears to a great diversity of client experiences of the research process, some positive and some negative. Questionnaires, recording equipment and interviews were the most commonly discussed aspects of the research process.ImplicationsThese findings give us some indication of the issues that should be considered when planning research in the counselling psychology field.

Publisher

British Psychological Society

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Applied Psychology,Clinical Psychology

Reference32 articles.

1. The ecology of psychotherapy research.

2. “Therapeutizing” research: The positive impact of family‐focused research on participants

3. Beutler, L.E. & Crago, M , (1991). Psychotherapy research: An international review of programmatic studies. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

4. Bohart, A.C. & Tallman, K. (1998). The person as active agent in experiential therapy. In L.S. Greenberg , J.C. Watson & G. Lietaer , Handbook of experiential therapy. New York: Guilford Press.

5. British Psychological Society (2006). Code of Ethics and Conduct. Leicester: BPS.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3