The personal experiences and views of waiting for cognitive therapy in the NHS: A qualitative account

Author:

Young Charles

Abstract

This qualitative study employs Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) to illustrate the experiences and views of waiting for therapy of four participants who showed reliable and clinically significant improvement according to CORE-OM between their assessment interview and the start of their cognitive therapy in a primary care NHS psychology service – a service with a wait of between 45 and 90 days. The participants report mixed views and experiences of waiting for therapy despite the improvement suggested by the CORE-OM. In addition, two master themes that are relevant to the experience of waiting for therapy are discussed: Social Support and Mechanisms of Relief. While some researchers argue that the improved scores observed over the duration of a waiting period are nothing more than the result of a testing artefact, the experiences reported in this study suggest that real changes do take place between the assessment and start of therapy that may be accurately reflected by changes to people’s psychometric scores.

Publisher

British Psychological Society

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Applied Psychology,Clinical Psychology

Reference25 articles.

1. Changes in waiting-list patients over time: data on some commonly-used measures. Beware!

2. Beck, A.T. , Rush, A.J. , Shaw, B.F. & Emery (1979). Cognitive therapy of depression. New York: Guilford Press.

3. Assessment of social functioning in depression

4. Administrative, clinical, and ethical issues surrounding the use of waiting lists in the delivery of mental health services;Brown;The Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research,2002

5. Burns, D.D. (1989). The feel good handbook: Using the new mood therapy in everyday life. New York: Morrow.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3