Refusing to Bow: The diagnostic category of Borderline Personality Disorder considered from an Object Relations viewpoint

Author:

Fletcher Roly

Abstract

As practitioners working within the NHS, the majority of our clients have received a psychiatric diagnostic label, for example, Borderline Personality Disorder. Whilst such labels fit neatly with the current emphasis on time-limited, evidence-based, cost-effective psychological treatments for ‘target’ issues, they tell us little about the client’s particular emotional needs and how the more ‘destructive’ aspects of clients behaviour, particularly towards the practitioner’s attempts to work with them, can actually be understood. This paper outlines the Object Relations approach to Borderline Personality Disorder which is disadvantaged in the NHS due to its typically long-term open-ended nature. This approach focuses on the human condition as a whole and provides the practitioner, regardless of their preferred therapeutic model, with a particularly detailed framework for understanding the client’s inter-personal behaviour and their own emotional responses to such behaviour so that the therapeutic relationship might ultimately allow practitioner and client to feel valued and empowered rather ‘trapped’ by the application of a particular label.

Publisher

British Psychological Society

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Applied Psychology,Clinical Psychology

Reference24 articles.

1. American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association.

2. Bateman, A. & Fonagy, P. (2005). Mentalisation-based treatment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

3. Bateman, A. & Fonagy, P. (2006). Mentalisation-based treatment for borderline personality disorder: A practical guide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

4. Brandchaft, B. & Stolorow, R. (1984). The borderline concept: Pathological character or iatrogenic myth? In J. Lichtenberg , M. Bornstein & D. Silver , Empathy II. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.

5. Cashdan, S. (1988). Object relations therapy: Using the relationship. New York & London: Norton.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3