Abstract
Purpose and Methods:It is an interesting paradox that although coaches are expected to have supervision, little is known about coaching supervision. Coaching supervision has its roots in supervision in the therapeutic disciplines. The aim of this paper is to explore some of the key themes in the literature on supervision in those disciplines, and to discuss the limited research that has been conducted into coaching supervision within this context. Particular attention is paid to social work supervision, as two major proponents of coaching supervision, Peter Hawkins and Peter Bluckert, were originally social workers.Results:The paper shows the influence of therapeutic concepts and process on coaching supervision, and identifies some of the benefits and limitations of using a therapeutic model in coaching supervision. Coaches and purchasing organisations want different things from supervision. Themes in the therapeutic literature concerning the transition from practitioner to supervisor are highlighted, suggesting that coaches making this transition need to learn to think like a supervisor, and find ways to manage the power inherent in the role.Conclusion:More research into coaching supervision is needed to find out what is happening in practice.
Publisher
British Psychological Society
Reference50 articles.
1. Arney, E. (2006). Coaching the Coaches. Training Journal, November, 51–55.
2. Arney, E. (2007). Interviewed in Feature Focus Coaching Supervision: Where are we headed? (4 March), 2–4. www.i-coachacademy.com
3. Association for Coaching (2005). Supervision Report (April). London.
4. A Multidimensional Framework for the Analysis of Supervision of Counseling
5. The challenge of psychotherapy-based supervision: making the pieces fit;Bernard;Counsellor Education and Supervision,1992
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献