Abstract
The Covid–19 pandemic has demonstrated the desire of government to implement evidence–based behavioural policies. However, questions still remain as to how scientists communicate effectively with policymakers. Ferguson (2015) discusses the contributory role of public mistrust in psychological science, due to internal issues such as the replication crisis and questionable research practices. I suggest that there is a more fundamental disconnect between psychologists and policymakers. More pertinent barriers to effective communication are the differential aims of understanding versus influencing behaviour, and the tension between maintaining objectivity and engaging with advocacy.
Publisher
British Psychological Society
Reference15 articles.
1. British Psychological Society (2019). A psychological manifesto for the next government. Retrieved from https://www.bps.org.uk/sites/www.bps.org.uk/files/Policy/Policy%20-%20Files/A%20Psychological%20Manifesto.pdf
2. Cairney, P. & Kwiatkowski, R. (2017). How to communicate effectively with policymakers: Combine insights from psychology and policy studies. Palgrave Communications, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-017-0046-8
3. “Everybody knows psychology is not a real science”: Public perceptions of psychology and how we can improve our relationship with policymakers, the scientific community, and the general public.
4. Haig, B.D. (2018). An abductive theory of scientific method. Method matters in psychology. Studies in applied philosophy, epistemology and rational ethics, vol 45 Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01051-5_3
5. Hutchings, J., Bowes, L., Hastings, R. (2020). A multicentre cluster randomised-controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of KiVa to reduce bullying in primary schools. Retrieved 15 September 2020 from https://fundingawards.nihr.ac.uk/award/17/92/11.