A systematic review of gender stereotype beliefs and their relationship with youth sport participation and performance

Author:

Cormack Elanor E.,Hand Christopher J.

Abstract

Gender stereotype beliefs are potentially important in determining how well people perform in and engage with sport and exercise. This systematic review provides a critical snapshot of the current research to identify the volume of literature available and insights into the relationship between gender stereotype beliefs and performance and participation in youth sport and exercise. The review also considered the evidence to support current theoretical models (stereotype threat, expectancy-value model). The systematic search found only eight studies that explored the topic. The review findings showed that there is a need for more replication studies to allow firm conclusions to be drawn. There was substantial variation in the studies’ methodological approaches with a complex impact pathway of gender stereotype shown. A mixed relationship was found between stereotype beliefs and performance, whereas stereotype beliefs were consistently found to relate to participation. Perceived ability and stereotype awareness were found to be potentially important in both performance and participation effects. Situational and individual variables such as extent of stereotype in the sport and internalisation of stereotypes are also likely to determine the impact of a stereotype belief and these need to be explored further, particularly in young people. Limitations that were found in the current evidence-base include a focus on school-based studies, a lack of quantifiable measures of participation, and a need to differentiate between the internalisation and socialisation hypotheses. This review highlights critical gaps in the literature and provides clear questions for further investigation. In particular, the lack of community-based samples, quantitative measures of participation, or replication studies weaken the conclusions that can be drawn. Suggestions for further research include studies that differentiate the theoretical mechanisms.

Publisher

British Psychological Society

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3