Barriers and improvements to the clinical psychology doctorate selection process-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Barriers and improvements to the clinical psychology doctorate selection process

Published:2021-03 Issue:339 Volume:1 Page:16-20
ISSN:1747-5732
Container-title:Clinical Psychology Forum
language:en
Short-container-title:bpscpf

Author:

Bawa Hetashi,Cudmore Kate,Ong Leanna,Knott Katie

Abstract

The Pre-Qualification Group conducted a survey for individuals working in clinical psychology. This article presents the barriers and improvements of the selection process for the clinical psychology doctorate. We hope to highlight this along with Minorities sub-committee projects.

Publisher

British Psychological Society

Subject

Clinical Psychology

Reference4 articles.

1. Alcock, K. (2019) ‘Thrown against a sharp white background: Access, inclusion & anti-racism in clinical psychology’. Presented at the GTiCP Conference 2019. Accessed from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GsDFPCNr4Lc

2. The journey of BME aspiring psychologists into clinical psychology training: barriers and ideas for inclusive change;Bawa;Clinical Psychology Forum,2019

3. Clearing House (2020). ‘National numbers for NHS places’. Accessed from https://www.leeds.ac.uk/chpccp/numbers.html

4. Snell, T. and Ramsden, R. (2020). Guidelines Vs Reality: The Work Experiences of Assistant Psychologists and Honorary Assistant Psychologists in the UK [Blog]. Retrieved (27 September 2020), from https://acpuk.org.uk/guidelines_versus_reality/.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Work-life balance for aspiring clinical psychologists: Topics from reflective practice sessions;Clinical Psychology Forum;2023-01

2. Reflections on internet-based methods of increasing access and inclusion in clinical psychology;Clinical Psychology Forum;2022-07

3. The work experiences of assistant psychologists and honorary assistant psychologists: Guidelines vs reality;Clinical Psychology Forum;2022-03