The road less travelled? An attempt to understand why families consult independent clinical psychologists

Author:

Hipkin Lynne

Abstract

The media often vilifies both practitioners and their clients in the private health sector, suggesting that this is the world of the wealthy and privileged. When I was training in the 1990s NHS teams often expressed suspicion of private therapists, whereas now there are increasing numbers of psychologists choosing independent practice (the British Psychological Society’s cross-divisional Special Group for independent practitioners has over 600 members and there is now an Independent Practitioner Network in the Faculty for Children, Young People and their Families). There are still, perhaps understandably, mixed views among my psychologist colleagues about the morality of working outside the public organisation that trained us. However, there are also concerns that access to psychologist-led interventions is becoming more limited in NHS settings (MIND, 2013) and NHS Choices (seewww.nhs.uk/conditions/Counselling/Pages/Introduction.aspx) now references ‘private therapy’ as an option for their users. This small scale survey attempted to explore clients’ perspectives on their route to private practice, and the results suggest that ordinary families are concerned and determined to access direct psychological support, and often make financial sacrifices to do so. It carries potentially important messages for psychologists in both public and private practice.

Publisher

British Psychological Society

Subject

Clinical Psychology

Reference9 articles.

1. Besley, T. , Hall, J. & Preston, I. (1996). The demand for private health insurance: Do waiting lists matter? Institute of Fiscal Studies Working Paper (W96/07).

2. Patients as healthcare consumers in the public and private sectors: A qualitative study of acupuncture in the UK;Bishop;BMC Health Services Research,2011

3. British Psychological Society (2013). Ethics Guidelines for Internet-mediated Research. INF206/1.2013. Leicester: Author.

4. Francis, R. (Chair) (2013). Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry. London: Stationery Office.

5. Gabriel, Y. & Lang, T. (2006). The unmanageable consumer. London: SAGE Publications.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3