What is helpful and unhelpful about psychological therapy from a Community Mental Health Team: Service user views

Author:

Sale Olivia,Walsh Kathryn,Mal Radha-Rian

Abstract

Routine quantitative outcome measures are commonly used within mental health services to provide an overview of change made by service users from the beginning to end of therapy. Whilst this is useful, these measures do not provide insight into why any changes may, or may not, have occurred. This article explores the results of a qualitative service evaluation conducted in an NHS community mental health team (CMHT). The questionnaire asked service users about aspects of therapy that they found helpful or unhelpful. Crucially, the questionnaire gave voice to service users who did not complete therapy and thus did not complete the final quantitative outcome measure. Analysis of data using a thematic analysis approach identified several themes, 1) whether it was the right time to access therapy, 2) challenges in maintaining progress outside of therapy, 3) meeting service user expectations of therapy, 4) whether service users can be vulnerable, 5) impact of therapy on the service users understanding of themselves and their emotions, and 6) flexibility within the service structure. Overall, service users found therapy to be challenging, yet the support and flexibility offered by their therapist was valued. The team used the results to reflect on their practice and to implement changes moving forward.

Publisher

British Psychological Society

Reference8 articles.

1. Baker, C. & Kirk-Wade, E. (2023). Mental health statistics: prevalence, services and funding in England. The House of Commons Library. https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/SN06988/SN06988.pdf.

2. Bidonde, J. , Meneses-Echavez, J.F. , Hafstad, E. , Brunborg, G.S. & Bang, L. (2023). Methods, strategies, and incentives to increase response to mental health surveys among adolescents: A systematic review. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-023-02096-z.

3. Coates, E. & Walker, J. (2022). Adults of Working Age (AWA) Psychological Services BSMHFT integrated hub CORE report.

4. Department of Health. (2013). The NHS Friends and Family Test Implementation Guidance. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/213047/NHS-Friends-and-Family-Test-Implementation-Guidance-v2.pdf.

5. A qualitative meta-analysis examining clients’ experiences of psychotherapy: A new agenda;Levitt;Psychological Bulletin,2016

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3