Service evaluation of reflective parenting groups: What are parents’ perspectives on the usefulness of RP groups in improving parental mentalisation and reflective functioning?

Author:

Fergus Sade-Louise,Eracleous Helen

Abstract

Family safeguarding services bring together multi-agency professionals to support children and families. The recruitment of clinical psychologists has led to the further development of psychological interventions to support families. Reflective parenting groups are an evidence-based intervention offered in family safeguarding services which aim to enhance parents’ capacity to reflect on and mentalise their own and their child or children’s thoughts, feelings, behaviours and intentions and thus better equip them to develop positive parenting practices and relationships with their children. The importance of evaluating services is recognised as best practice. This service evaluation aims to explore parents’ experiences of reflective parenting (RP) groups and their perceptions of how useful the groups are in improving parental reflective functioning. The study employed a qualitative design and eight parents recruited through opportunistic sampling completed semi-structured interviews. Results were analysed using thematic analysis which yielded four main themes and eight subthemes. The four main themes identified were: (1) Benefits of RP groups, (2) Barriers to engaging in RP groups, (3) Different perspectives on online groups, (4) The importance of including fathers. The findings suggest that the groups are effective in improving parental reflective functioning and parents identified several benefits which are supported by the current literature. The study highlights areas of improvement which could enhance parents’ experiences such as facilitating safe and collaborative spaces for parents to share their experiences, offering in person as well as online groups and actively engaging more fathers in the groups.

Publisher

British Psychological Society

Reference31 articles.

1. A theory of thinking;Bion;The International Journal of Psycho-analysis,1962

2. Buston, K. , O’Brien, R. , Wight, D. & Henderson, M. (2019). The reflective component of the Mellow Bumps parenting intervention: Implementation, engagement and mechanisms of change. Plos one, 14 (4).

3. Using thematic analysis in psychology

4. Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. Sage.

5. Parent-specific reciprocity from infancy to adolescence shapes children’s social competence and dialogical skills;Feldman;Attachment & Human Development,2013

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3