Changing conversations in suicide risk management: A new model called RISK

Author:

Guyers Mark

Abstract

This article presents a new communicative model for managing risk of suicide. The RISK framework can be used in conjunction with traditional problem focused approaches to increase the collaboration between healthcare professionals and patients when creating a safety plan.Using this model allows the healthcare professional to curiously ask how the person has kept safe for this long(Resources),how much they know already about how they have done this and what they would notice if the thoughts of attempting suicide were absent or managed(Increments).Next, the framework considers how might the resources discussed be best shared with others (e.g. professionals, family) and who or what else outside of the room might be able to help the increments(Sharing).Finally, in this framework, the professional aims to understand how all of the above ensures the individual keeps their existing expertise at the forefront of the difficulties they are experiencing(Knowledge).Inspired by the ‘GRIN Model of Hope’ (Unwin & Unwin, 2019), this framework also derives from solution focused brief therapy and positive psychology. Within this paper, we follow ‘Alan’ who has arrived at his health appointment in distress, and shares that he wants to end his life. The implications for clinical practice are discussed.The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate how solution focused risk management approaches might be better realised in any healthcare setting where risk presents.

Publisher

British Psychological Society

Subject

Clinical Psychology

Reference43 articles.

1. Berg, I.K. (1994). Words were originally magic. New York: Norton.

2. Berg, I.K. & Miller, S. (1992). Working with the problem drinker: A solution focused approach. New York: Norton.

3. Survival as medical registrar on call: remember the doughnut

4. Increasing Knowledge, Skills, and Confidence Concerning Students’ Suicidality Through a Gatekeeper Workshop for School Staff;Brown;Frontiers in Psychology,2018

5. Predicting suicide following self-harm: systematic review of risk factors and risk scales

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3