‘It’s not only business or embarrassment’: Justifying non-attendance of cervical screening on social media discussions

Author:

Burke Shani,McGeechan Grant,James Becky

Abstract

This research applied discursive psychological analysis to discussions about cervical screening on Facebook and Twitter. The analysisfocused on how people justify not attending cervical screening. Previous research lias identified barriers to attending cervical screening such as embarrassment, fear of pain, and the procedure being too triggering for survivors of sexual assault. Findings identified three discourses around how social media users positioned attendance and non-attendance: (i) practical barriers such as the length of time waiting for results; (ii) psychological barriers such as cervical screenings being triggering for survivors of sexual assault; (iii) taking accountability for non-attendance. Findings are discussed in light of how non-attendance to cervical screenings is accounted for, which campaigners could consider when promoting the importance of attending cervical screening.

Publisher

British Psychological Society

Reference45 articles.

1. In pursuit of leanness: The management of appearance, affect and masculinities within a men’s weight loss forum;Bennett;Health: an Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness & Medicine,2013

2. Billig M. (1991). Ideology and opinions: Studies in rhetorical psychology. London: Sage.

3. Billig M. (1996). Arguing and thinking: A rhetorical approach to social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

4. Billig M. (1998). Rhetorical and discursive analysis: How families talk about the royal family. In N. Hayes (Ed.) Doing qualitative analysis in psychology (pp.39–54). Hove: Psychology Press.

5. Billig, M. , Condor, S. , Edwards D. et al. (1988). Ideological dilemmas: A social psychology of everyday thinking. London: Sage.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Discourse;The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible;2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3