How library systems influence the interlibrary loan workflow

Author:

Kassler Martina1ORCID,Fors Veronica2

Affiliation:

1. Karlstad University

2. Örebro University

Abstract

The interlibrary loan (ILL) workflow is influenced by several outside and inside factors, which can variously affect its efficacy in providing items to library users. This paper will show differences and similarities in the ILL workflow, from customer order to delivery or return of the item, when using two different library systems. The ILL workflow includes both internal and external document supply because the libraries offer and provide services both to their own users and to other libraries. Some supplied items are returnable (for example books) and others are non-returnable (for example copies of articles). This workflow chain involves a series of steps and starts with a request made by a user. This is followed by the entry of necessary data into both the receiving and lending libraries’ ILL systems to administrate the request and continues with the delivery to the end user. For returnable items, the final step is returning said items to the provider. This paper will compare how two Swedish libraries (Örebro University Library and Karlstad University Library) established their ILL workflows and how decisions made in the ILL process are based on the different library systems used (Alma and Koha). It concludes with a discussion of what can be learned from the comparison, the benefits and challenges presented by each system and any improvements that can be made.

Publisher

ULiège Library

Reference17 articles.

1. Askey, D. (2008). We love open source software: No, you can't have our code. The Code4Lib Journal, (5). https://journal.code4lib.org/articles/527

2. Branch, D. (2014). Alma in the cloud: Implementation through the eyes of acquisitions. In B. R. Bernhardt & L. H. Hinds (Eds.), Too much is not enough! Charleston Conference proceedings, 2013 (pp. 545–550). https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284315322

3. Breeding, M. (2015a). Adoption patterns of proprietary and open source ILS in U.S. libraries. Computers in Libraries, 35(8), 17-18, 20.

4. Breeding, M. (2015b). Introduction and concepts. Library Technology Reports, 51(4), 5–19. https://journals.ala.org/index.php/ltr/article/view/5686/7062

5. Breeding, M. (2017, November 1). Open source software. American Libraries Magazine. https://americanlibrariesmagazine.org/2017/11/01/open-source-software/

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3