Standards for Measures Used for Public Reporting of Efficiency in Health Care

Author:

Krumholz Harlan M.,Keenan Patricia S.,Brush John E.,Bufalino Vincent J.,Chernew Michael E.,Epstein Andrew J.,Heidenreich Paul A.,Ho Vivian,Masoudi Frederick A.,Matchar David B.,Normand Sharon-Lise T.,Rumsfeld John S.,Schuur Jeremiah D.,Smith Sidney C.,Spertus John A.,Walsh Mary Norine

Abstract

The assessment of medical practice is evolving rapidly in the United States. An initial focus on structure and process performance measures assessing the quality of medical care is now being supplemented with efficiency measures to quantify the “value” of healthcare delivery. This statement, building on prior work that articulated standards for publicly reported outcomes measures, identifies preferred attributes for measures used to assess efficiency in the allocation of healthcare resources. The attributes identified in this document combined with the previously published standards are intended to serve as criteria for assessing the suitability of efficiency measures for public reporting. This statement identifies the following attributes to be considered for publicly reported efficiency measures: integration of the quality and cost; valid cost measurement and analysis; minimal incentive to provide poor quality care; and proper attribution of the measure. The attributes described in this statement are relevant to a wide range of efforts to profile the efficiency of various healthcare providers, including hospitals, healthcare systems, managed-care organizations, physicians, group practices, and others that deliver coordinated care.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Reference30 articles.

1. A Left Atrial Appendage Thrombus Mimicking Atrial Myxoma

2. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2007 Update

3. The Rise In Spending Among Medicare Beneficiaries: The Role Of Chronic Disease Prevalence And Changes In Treatment Intensity

4. AQA. AQA principles of “efficiency” measures. Available at: http://www.aqaalliance.org/files/PrinciplesofEfficiencyMeasurementApril2006.doc. Accessed August 25 2008.

5. National Quality Forum. Available at: http://www.qualityforum.org/projects/ongoing/priorities/index.asp. Accessed August 25 2008.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3