Author:
Krumholz Harlan M.,Keenan Patricia S.,Brush John E.,Bufalino Vincent J.,Chernew Michael E.,Epstein Andrew J.,Heidenreich Paul A.,Ho Vivian,Masoudi Frederick A.,Matchar David B.,Normand Sharon-Lise T.,Rumsfeld John S.,Schuur Jeremiah D.,Smith Sidney C.,Spertus John A.,Walsh Mary Norine
Abstract
The assessment of medical practice is evolving rapidly in the United States. An initial focus on structure and process performance measures assessing the quality of medical care is now being supplemented with efficiency measures to quantify the “value” of healthcare delivery. This statement, building on prior work that articulated standards for publicly reported outcomes measures, identifies preferred attributes for measures used to assess efficiency in the allocation of healthcare resources. The attributes identified in this document combined with the previously published standards are intended to serve as criteria for assessing the suitability of efficiency measures for public reporting. This statement identifies the following attributes to be considered for publicly reported efficiency measures: integration of the quality and cost; valid cost measurement and analysis; minimal incentive to provide poor quality care; and proper attribution of the measure. The attributes described in this statement are relevant to a wide range of efforts to profile the efficiency of various healthcare providers, including hospitals, healthcare systems, managed-care organizations, physicians, group practices, and others that deliver coordinated care.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Subject
Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Reference30 articles.
1. A Left Atrial Appendage Thrombus Mimicking Atrial Myxoma
2. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2007 Update
3. The Rise In Spending Among Medicare Beneficiaries: The Role Of Chronic Disease Prevalence And Changes In Treatment Intensity
4. AQA. AQA principles of “efficiency” measures. Available at: http://www.aqaalliance.org/files/PrinciplesofEfficiencyMeasurementApril2006.doc. Accessed August 25 2008.
5. National Quality Forum. Available at: http://www.qualityforum.org/projects/ongoing/priorities/index.asp. Accessed August 25 2008.
Cited by
44 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献