Rivaroxaban Plus Aspirin Versus Aspirin Alone in Patients With Prior Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (COMPASS-PCI)

Author:

Bainey Kevin R.1ORCID,Welsh Robert C.1,Connolly Stuart J.2,Marsden Tamara2,Bosch Jackie2,Fox Keith A.A.3,Steg P. Gabriel4,Vinereanu Dragos5,Connolly Derek L.6,Berkowitz Scott D.7,Foody JoAnne M.7,Probstfield Jeffrey L.8,Branch Kelley R.8,Lewis Basil S.9,Diaz Rafael10,Muehlhofer Eva11,Widimsky Petr12,Yusuf Salim2,Eikelboom John W.2,Bhatt Deepak L.13,

Affiliation:

1. Mazankowski Alberta Heart Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada (K.R.B., R.C.W.).

2. Population Heath Research Institute, McMaster University and Hamilton Health Sciences, ON, Canada (S.J.C., T.M., J.B., S.Y., J.W.E.).

3. Department of Medicine, University of Edinburgh, UK (K.A.A.F.).

4. Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris, France (P.G.S.).

5. University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, Bucharest, Romania (D.V.).

6. Birmingham City Hospital, UK (D.L.C.).

7. Bayer AG, Parsippany, NJ (S.D.B., J.M.F.).

8. University of Washington, Seattle (J.L.P., K.R.B.).

9. Lady Davis Carmel Medical Center, Haifa, Israel (B.S.L.).

10. Estudios Clínicos Latino América and Instituto Cardiovascular de Rosario, Argentina (R.D.).

11. Bayer AG, Wuppertal, Germany (E.M.).

12. Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (P.W.).

13. Brigham and Women’s Hospital Heart and Vascular Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (D.L.B.).

Abstract

Background: The COMPASS trial (Cardiovascular Outcomes for People using Anticoagulation Strategies) demonstrated that dual pathway inhibition (DPI) with rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily plus aspirin 100 mg once daily versus aspirin 100 mg once daily reduced the primary major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) outcome of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke, as well as, mortality, in patients with chronic coronary syndromes or peripheral arterial disease. Whether this remains true in patients with a history of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is unknown. Methods: In a prespecified subgroup analysis from COMPASS, we examined the outcomes of patients with a chronic coronary syndrome with or without a previous PCI treated with DPI versus aspirin alone. Among patients with a previous PCI, we studied the effects of treatment according to the timing of the previous PCI. Results: Of the 27 395 patients in COMPASS, 16 560 patients with a chronic coronary syndrome were randomly assigned to DPI or aspirin, and, of these, 9862 (59.6%) had previous PCI (mean age 68.2±7.8, female 19.4%, diabetes mellitus 35.7%, previous myocardial infarction 74.8%, multivessel PCI 38.0%). Average time from PCI to randomization was 5.4 years (SD, 4.4) and follow-up was 1.98 (SD, 0.72) years. Regardless of previous PCI, DPI versus aspirin produced consistent reductions in MACE (PCI: 4.0% versus 5.5%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.74 [95% CI, 0.61–0.88]; no PCI: 4.4% versus 5.7%; HR, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.61–0.94], P -interaction=0.85) and mortality (PCI: 2.5% versus 3.5%; HR, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.58–0.92]; no PCI: 4.1% versus 5.0%; HR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.64–1.00], P -interaction=0.59), but increased major bleeding (PCI: 3.3% versus 2.0%; HR, 1.72 [95% CI, 1.34–2.21]; no PCI: 2.9% versus 1.8%; HR, 1.58 [95% CI, 1.15–2.17], P -interaction=0.68). In those with previous PCI, DPI compared with aspirin produced consistent (robust) reductions in MACE irrespective of time since previous PCI (as early as 1 year and as far as 10 years; P -interaction=0.65), irrespective of having a previous myocardial infarction ( P -interaction=0.64). Conclusions: DPI compared with aspirin produced consistent reductions in MACE and mortality but with increased major bleeding with or without previous PCI. Among those with previous PCI 1 year and beyond, the effects on MACE and mortality were consistent irrespective of time since last PCI. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT01776424.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3