Apixaban for Patients With Atrial Fibrillation on Hemodialysis: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Author:

Pokorney Sean D.1ORCID,Chertow Glenn M.2,Al-Khalidi Hussein R.1ORCID,Gallup Dianne1,Dignacco Pat1,Mussina Kurt2,Bansal Nisha3,Gadegbeku Crystal A.4,Garcia David A.3,Garonzik Samira5,Lopes Renato D.1ORCID,Mahaffey Kenneth W.2,Matsuda Kelly26,Middleton John P.1,Rymer Jennifer A.1ORCID,Sands George H.7,Thadhani Ravi8,Thomas Kevin L.1ORCID,Washam Jeffrey B.1,Winkelmayer Wolfgang C.9,Granger Christopher B.1ORCID,

Affiliation:

1. Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (S.D.P., H.R.A.-K., D.G., P.D., R.D.L., J.P.M., J.A.R., K.L.T., J.B.W., C.B.G.).

2. Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA (G.M.C., K.W.M., K.M.).

3. University of Washington, Seattle (N.B., D.A.G.).

4. Temple University, Philadelphia, PA (C.A.G.).

5. Bristol Myers-Squibb, Princeton, NJ (S.G.).

6. Frenova Renal Research, Waltham, MA (K.M.).

7. Pfizer, New York, NY (G.H.S.).

8. Massachussetts General and Brigham and Women’s Hospitals, Boston (R.T.).

9. Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX (W.C.W.).

Abstract

Background: There are no randomized data evaluating the safety or efficacy of apixaban for stroke prevention in patients with end-stage kidney disease on hemodialysis and with atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods: The RENAL-AF trial (Renal Hemodialysis Patients Allocated Apixaban Versus Warfarin in Atrial Fibrillation) was a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-outcome evaluation (PROBE) of apixaban versus warfarin in patients receiving hemodialysis with AF and a CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score ≥2. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to 5 mg of apixaban twice daily (2.5 mg twice daily for patients ≥80 years of age, weight ≤60 kg, or both) or dose-adjusted warfarin. The primary outcome was time to major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding. Secondary outcomes included stroke, mortality, and apixaban pharmacokinetics. Pharmacokinetic sampling was day 1, day 3, and month 1. Results: From January 2017 through January 2019, 154 patients were randomly assigned to apixaban (n=82) or warfarin (n=72). The trial stopped prematurely because of enrollment challenges. Time in therapeutic range (international normalized ratio, 2.0–3.0) for warfarin-treated patients was 44% (interquartile range, 23%–59%). The 1-year rates for major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding were 32% and 26% in apixaban and warfarin groups, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.20 [95% CI, 0.63–2.30]), whereas 1-year rates for stroke or systemic embolism were 3.0% and 3.3% in apixaban and warfarin groups, respectively. Death was the most common major event in the apixaban (21 patients [26%]) and warfarin (13 patients [18%]) arms. The pharmacokinetic substudy enrolled the target 50 patients. Median steady-state 12-hour area under the curve was 2475 ng/mL×h (10th to 90th percentiles, 1342–3285) for 5 mg of apixaban twice daily and 1269 ng/mL×h (10th to 90th percentiles, 615–1946) for 2.5 mg of apixaban twice daily. There was substantial overlap between minimum apixaban blood concentration, 12-hour area under the curve, and maximum apixaban blood concentration for patients with and without a major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding event. Conclusions: There was inadequate power to draw any conclusion regarding rates of major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding comparing apixaban and warfarin in patients with AF and end-stage kidney disease on hemodialysis. Clinically relevant bleeding events were ≈10-fold more frequent than stroke or systemic embolism among this population on anticoagulation, highlighting the need for future randomized studies evaluating the risks versus benefits of anticoagulation among patients with AF and end-stage kidney disease on hemodialysis. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT02942407.

Funder

Bristol-Myers Squibb

Pfizer

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3