Affiliation:
1. From the Divisions of Preventive Medicine (S.M., J.E.B., P.M.R.) and Cardiovascular Medicine (S.M., P.M.R.), Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass; LipoScience, Inc (J.D.O.), Raleigh, NC; University of Michigan Medical Center (R.S.R.), Ann Arbor, Mich; and Children’s Hospital (N.R.), Boston, Mass.
Abstract
Background—
Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy measures the number and size of lipoprotein particles instead of their cholesterol or triglyceride content, but its clinical utility is uncertain.
Methods and Results—
Baseline lipoproteins were measured by NMR in 27 673 initially healthy women followed up for incident cardiovascular disease (n=1015) over an 11-year period. After adjustment for nonlipid risk factors, hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for the top versus the bottom quintile of NMR-measured lipoprotein particle concentration (measured in particles per liter) were 2.51 (1.91 to 3.30) for low-density lipoprotein (LDL
NMR
), 0.91 (0.75 to 1.12) for high-density lipoprotein (HDL
NMR
), 1.71 (1.38 to 2.12) for very low–density lipoprotein (VLDL
NMR
), and 2.25 (1.80 to 2.81) for the LDL
NMR
/HDL
NMR
ratio. Similarly adjusted results for NMR-measured lipoprotein particle size (measured in nanometers) were 0.64 (0.52 to 0.79) for LDL
NMR
size, 0.65 (0.51 to 0.81) for HDL
NMR
size, and 1.37 (1.10 to 1.70) for VLDL
NMR
size. Hazard ratios for NMR measures were comparable but not superior to standard lipids (total cholesterol 2.08 [1.63 to 2.67], LDL cholesterol 1.74 [1.40 to 2.16], HDL cholesterol 0.52 [0.42 to 0.64], triglycerides 2.58 [1.95 to 3.41], non-HDL cholesterol 2.52 [1.95 to 3.25], total/HDL cholesterol ratio 2.82 [2.23 to 3.58]) and apolipoproteins (B
100
2.57 [1.98 to 3.33], A-1 0.63 [0.52 to 0.77], and B
100
/A-1 ratio 2.79 [2.21 to 3.54]). Essentially no reclassification improvement was found with the addition of the LDL
NMR
particle concentration or apolipoprotein B
100
to a model that already included the total/HDL cholesterol ratio and nonlipid risk factors (net reclassification index 0% and 1.9%, respectively), nor did the addition of either variable result in a statistically significant improvement in the c-index.
Conclusions—
In this prospective study of healthy women, cardiovascular disease risk prediction associated with lipoprotein profiles evaluated by NMR was comparable but not superior to that of standard lipids or apolipoproteins.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Subject
Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Cited by
432 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献