Polymer-Free Sirolimus- and Probucol-Eluting Versus New Generation Zotarolimus-Eluting Stents in Coronary Artery Disease

Author:

Massberg Steffen1,Byrne Robert A.1,Kastrati Adnan1,Schulz Stefanie1,Pache Jürgen1,Hausleiter Jörg1,Ibrahim Tareq1,Fusaro Massimiliano1,Ott Ilka1,Schömig Albert1,Laugwitz Karl-Ludwig1,Mehilli Julinda1

Affiliation:

1. From the Deutsches Herzzentrum, Technische Universität, Munich, Germany (S.M., R.A.B., A.K., S.S., J.P., J.H., M.F., I.O., A.S., J.M.); and Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität, Munich, Germany (T.I., A.S., K.L.L.).

Abstract

Background— Durable polymer coatings have been implicated in mid- and long-term adverse events after drug-eluting stent implantation. A polymer-free dual-drug sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stent and a new generation permanent polymer zotarolimus-eluting stent are recently developed technologies demonstrating encouraging results. Methods and Results— In a clinical trial with minimal exclusion criteria, we randomly assigned 3002 patients to treatment with sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stents versus zotarolimus-eluting stents. The trial was designed to demonstrate noninferiority of the sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stents. The primary end point was the combined incidence of cardiac death, target-vessel–related myocardial infarction, or target-lesion revascularization at 1-year follow-up. Follow-up angiography was scheduled at 6 to 8 months. The sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stent was noninferior to the zotarolimus-eluting stent in terms of occurrence of the primary end point (13.1% versus 13.5%, respectively, P noninferiority =0.006; hazard ratio=0.97, 95% confidence interval, 0.78 to 1.19; P superiority =0.74). The incidence of definite/probable stent thrombosis was low in both groups (1.1% versus 1.2%, respectively; hazard ratio=0.91 [95% confidence interval, 0.45 to 1.84], P =0.80). With regard to angiographic efficacy, there were no differences between the sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stent and the zotarolimus-eluting stent in terms of either in-segment binary angiographic restenosis (13.3% versus 13.4% respectively; P =0.95) or in-stent late luminal loss (0.31±0.58 mm versus 0.29±0.56 mm, respectively; P =0.46). Conclusion— In this large-scale study powered for clinical end points, a polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stent was noninferior to a new generation durable polymer-based zotarolimus-eluting stent out to 12 months. Clinical Trial Registration— http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier NCT 00598533.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Reference32 articles.

1. Vascular Responses to Drug Eluting Stents

2. Polymer coatings and delayed arterial healing following drug-eluting stent implantation;Byrne RA;Minerva Cardioangiol,2009

3. Mechanisms of controlled drug release from drug-eluting stents

4. Development of a novel biocompatible polymer system for extended drug release in a next-generation drug-eluting stent

5. The next-generation Endeavor Resolute stent: 4-month clinical and angiographic results from the Endeavor Resolute first-in-man trial;Meredith IT;EuroIntervention,2007

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3