Association of Traditional Cardiovascular Risk Factors With Venous Thromboembolism

Author:

Mahmoodi Bakhtawar K.1,Cushman Mary1,Anne Næss Inger1,Allison Matthew A.1,Bos Willem Jan1,Brækkan Sigrid K.1,Cannegieter Suzanne C.1,Gansevoort Ron T.1,Gona Philimon N.1,Hammerstrøm Jens1,Hansen John-Bjarne1,Heckbert Susan1,Holst Anders G.1,Lakoski Susan G.1,Lutsey Pamela L.1,Manson JoAnn E.1,Martin Lisa W.1,Matsushita Kunihiro1,Meijer Karina1,Overvad Kim1,Prescott Eva1,Puurunen Marja1,Rossouw Jacques E.1,Sang Yingying1,Severinsen Marianne T.1,ten Berg Jur1,Folsom Aaron R.1,Zakai Neil A.1

Affiliation:

1. From Department of Cardiology and Internal Medicine, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands (B.K.M., W.J.B., J.t.B.); Department of Haematology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, The Netherlands (B.K.M., K. Meijer); Departments of Medicine and Pathology, University of Vermont, Burlington (M.C., N.A.Z.); Department of Hematology, Trondheim University Hospital, Norway (I.A.N., J.H.); Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of California San...

Abstract

Background: Much controversy surrounds the association of traditional cardiovascular disease risk factors with venous thromboembolism (VTE). Methods: We performed an individual level random-effect meta-analysis including 9 prospective studies with measured baseline cardiovascular disease risk factors and validated VTE events. Definitions were harmonized across studies. Traditional cardiovascular disease risk factors were modeled categorically and continuously using restricted cubic splines. Estimates were obtained for overall VTE, provoked VTE (ie, VTE occurring in the presence of 1 or more established VTE risk factors), and unprovoked VTE, pulmonary embolism, and deep-vein thrombosis. Results: The studies included 244 865 participants with 4910 VTE events occurring during a mean follow-up of 4.7 to 19.7 years per study. Age, sex, and body mass index-adjusted hazard ratios for overall VTE were 0.98 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.89−1.07) for hypertension, 0.97 (95% CI: 0.88−1.08) for hyperlipidemia, 1.01 (95% CI: 0.89−1.15) for diabetes mellitus, and 1.19 (95% CI: 1.08−1.32) for current smoking. After full adjustment, these estimates were numerically similar. When modeled continuously, an inverse association was observed for systolic blood pressure (hazard ratio=0.79 [95% CI: 0.68−0.92] at systolic blood pressure 160 vs 110 mm Hg) but not for diastolic blood pressure or lipid measures with VTE. An important finding from VTE subtype analyses was that cigarette smoking was associated with provoked but not unprovoked VTE. Fully adjusted hazard ratios for the associations of current smoking with provoked and unprovoked VTE were 1.36 (95% CI: 1.22−1.52) and 1.08 (95% CI: 0.90−1.29), respectively. Conclusions: Except for the association between cigarette smoking and provoked VTE, which is potentially mediated through comorbid conditions such as cancer, the modifiable traditional cardiovascular disease risk factors are not associated with increased VTE risk. Higher systolic blood pressure showed an inverse association with VTE.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3