Eliminating Medication Copayments for Low-Income Older Adults at High Cardiovascular Risk: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Author:

Campbell David J.T.1234ORCID,Mitchell Chad5,Hemmelgarn Brenda R.6,Tonelli Marcello1234ORCID,Faris Peter17ORCID,Zhang Jianguo1,Tsuyuki Ross T.6ORCID,Fletcher Jane1ORCID,Au Flora2,Klarenbach Scott6,Exner Derek V.13,Manns Braden J.1234ORCID,

Affiliation:

1. Department of Community Health Sciences (D.J.T.C., M.T., P.F., J.Z., J.F., D.V.E., B.J.M.), Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Canada.

2. Department of Medicine (D.J.T.C., M.T., F.A., B.J.M.), Department of Cardiac Sciences (D.J.T.C., D.V.E.), Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Canada.

3. Libin Cardiovascular Institute (D.J.T.C., M.T., D.V.E., B.J.M.), Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Canada.

4. O’Brien Institute of Public Health (D.J.T.C., M.T., B.J.M.), Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Canada.

5. Pharmaceutical Branch, Alberta Health, Government of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada (C.M.).

6. Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada (B.R.H., R.T.T., S.K.).

7. Data Integration, Management, and Reporting, Analytics, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Canada (P.F.).

Abstract

Background: One in eight people with heart disease has poor medication adherence that, in part, is related to copayment costs. This study tested whether eliminating copayments for high-value medications among low-income older adults at high cardiovascular risk would improve clinical outcomes. Methods: This randomized 2×2 factorial trial studied 2 distinct interventions in Alberta, Canada: eliminating copayments for high-value preventive medications and a self-management education and support program (reported separately). The findings for the first intervention, which waived the usual 30% copayment on 15 medication classes commonly used to reduce cardiovascular events, compared with usual copayment, is reported here. The primary outcome was the composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, coronary revascularization, and cardiovascular-related hospitalizations over a 3-year follow-up. Rates of the primary outcome and its components were compared using negative binomial regression. Secondary outcomes included quality of life (Euroqol 5-dimension index score), medication adherence, and overall health care costs. Results: A total of 4761 individuals were randomized and followed for a median of 36 months. There was no evidence of statistical interaction ( P =0.99) or of a synergistic effect between the 2 interventions in the factorial trial with respect to the primary outcome, which allowed us to evaluate the effect of each intervention separately. The rate of the primary outcome was not reduced by copayment elimination, (521 versus 533 events, incidence rate ratio 0.84 [95% CI, 0.66–1.07], P =0.162). The incidence rate ratio for nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, and cardiovascular death (0.97 [95% CI, 0.67–1.39]), death (0.94 [95% CI, 0.80 to 1.11]), and cardiovascular-related hospitalizations (0.78 [95% CI, 0.57 to 1.06]) did not differ between groups. No significant between-group changes in quality of life over time were observed (mean difference, 0.012 [95% CI, –0.006 to 0.030], P =0.19). The proportion of participants who were adherent to statins was 0.72 versus 0.69 for the copayment elimination versus usual copayment groups, respectively (mean difference, 0.03 [95% CI, 0.006–0.06], P =0.016). Overall adjusted health care costs did not differ ($3575 [95% CI, –605 to 7168], P =0.098). Conclusions: In low-income adults at high cardiovascular risk, eliminating copayments (average, $35/mo) did not improve clinical outcomes or reduce health care costs, despite a modest improvement in adherence to medications. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT02579655.

Funder

Canadian Institutes of Health Research

Alberta Innovates

University of Calgary, Clinical Research Fund

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3