Components of Hemodynamic Load and Cardiovascular Events

Author:

Cooper Leroy L.1,Rong Jian1,Benjamin Emelia J.1,Larson Martin G.1,Levy Daniel1,Vita Joseph A.1,Hamburg Naomi M.1,Vasan Ramachandran S.1,Mitchell Gary F.1

Affiliation:

1. From Cardiovascular Engineering Inc, Norwood, MA (L.L.C., G.F.M.); Cardiovascular Research Center, Rhode Island Hospital, W. Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI (L.L.C.); Boston University and NHLBI’s Framingham Study, Framingham, MA (J.R., E.J.B., M.G.L., D.L.); Cardiology and Preventive Medicine Sections, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA (E.J.B., R.S.V.); Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Boston University, Boston, MA (M.G.L., R...

Abstract

Background— Elevated blood pressure is the leading modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD) and premature death. The blood pressure waveform consists of discrete hemodynamic components, derived from measured central pressure and flow, which may contribute separately to risk for an adverse outcome. However, pressure-flow measures have not been studied in a large, community-based sample. Methods and Results— We used proportional hazards models to examine the association of incident CVD with forward pressure wave amplitude, mean arterial pressure, and global reflection coefficient derived from wave separation analysis and echocardiography in 2492 participants (mean age 66±9 years, 56% women) in the Framingham Heart Study. During follow-up (0.04–6.8 years), 149 participants (6%) had a CVD event. In multivariable models adjusting for age, sex, antihypertensive therapy, body mass index, heart rate, total and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations, smoking, and the presence of diabetes mellitus, forward pressure wave amplitude (hazard ratio, 1.40; 95% confidence interval, 1.16–1.67; P =0.0003) was associated with incident CVD, whereas mean arterial pressure (hazard ratio, 1.10; 95% confidence interval, 0.94–1.29; P =0.25) and global wave reflection (hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% confidence interval, 0.78–1.12; P =0.58) were not. After adding systolic blood pressure and carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity to the model, forward pressure wave amplitude persisted as a correlate of events (hazard ratio, 1.33; 95% confidence interval, 1.05–1.68; P =0.02). Conclusions— Higher forward pressure wave amplitude (a measure of proximal aortic geometry and stiffness) was associated with increased risk for incident CVD, whereas mean arterial pressure and relative wave reflection (correlates of resistance vessel structure and function) were not associated with increased risk for incident CVD.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3