Impact of Bystander Automated External Defibrillator Use on Survival and Functional Outcomes in Shockable Observed Public Cardiac Arrests

Author:

Pollack Ross A.1,Brown Siobhan P.2,Rea Thomas34,Aufderheide Tom5,Barbic David6,Buick Jason E.7,Christenson Jim6,Idris Ahamed H.8,Jasti Jamie5,Kampp Michael9,Kudenchuk Peter34,May Susanne1,Muhr Marc10,Nichol Graham11,Ornato Joseph P.12,Sopko George13,Vaillancourt Christian14,Morrison Laurie715,Weisfeldt Myron1

Affiliation:

1. Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (R.A.P., M.W.)

2. Department of Biostatistics (S.P.B.)

3. University of Washington, Seattle (T.R., P.K.)

4. King County Emergency Medical Services, Public Health, Seattle, WA (T.R., P.K.)

5. Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee (T.A., J.J.)

6. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada (D.B., J.C.)

7. Rescu, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto, Canada (J.E.B, L.M.)

8. Departments of Emergency Medicine and Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (A.H.I.)

9. Department of Emergency Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland (M.K.)

10. Clark County Emergency Medical Services, Vancouver, WA (M.M.)

11. University of Washington–Harborview Center for Prehospital Emergency Care, Seattle (G.N.)

12. Department of Emergency Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond (J.P.O.)

13. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (G.S.)

14. Department of Emergency Medicine, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Canada (C.V.)

15. Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Ottawa, Canada (L.M.).

Abstract

Background: Survival following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) with shockable rhythms can be improved with early defibrillation. Although shockable OHCA accounts for only ≈25% of overall arrests, ≈60% of public OHCAs are shockable, offering the possibility of restoring thousands of individuals to full recovery with early defibrillation by bystanders. We sought to determine the association of bystander automated external defibrillator use with survival and functional outcomes in shockable observed public OHCA. Methods: From 2011 to 2015, the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium prospectively collected detailed information on all cardiac arrests at 9 regional centers. The exposures were shock administration by a bystander-applied automated external defibrillator in comparison with initial defibrillation by emergency medical services. The primary outcome measure was discharge with normal or near-normal (favorable) functional status defined as a modified Rankin Score ≤2. Survival to hospital discharge was the secondary outcome measure. Results: Among 49 555 OHCAs, 4115 (8.3%) observed public OHCAs were analyzed, of which 2500 (60.8%) were shockable. A bystander shock was applied in 18.8% of the shockable arrests. Patients shocked by a bystander were significantly more likely to survive to discharge (66.5% versus 43.0%) and be discharged with favorable functional outcome (57.1% versus 32.7%) than patients initially shocked by emergency medical services. After adjusting for known predictors of outcome, the odds ratio associated with a bystander shock was 2.62 (95% confidence interval, 2.07–3.31) for survival to hospital discharge and 2.73 (95% confidence interval, 2.17–3.44) for discharge with favorable functional outcome. The benefit of bystander shock increased progressively as emergency medical services response time became longer. Conclusions: Bystander automated external defibrillator use before emergency medical services arrival in shockable observed public OHCA was associated with better survival and functional outcomes. Continued emphasis on public automated external defibrillator utilization programs may further improve outcomes of OHCA.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3