Black-White Differences in Incident Fatal, Nonfatal, and Total Coronary Heart Disease

Author:

Colantonio Lisandro D.1,Gamboa Christopher M.1,Richman Joshua S.1,Levitan Emily B.1,Soliman Elsayed Z.1,Howard George1,Safford Monika M.1

Affiliation:

1. From Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health (L.D.C., E.B.L.), Department of Medicine, School of Medicine (C.M.G.), Department of Surgery, School of Medicine (J.S.R.), Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health (G.H.), University of Alabama at Birmingham; Epidemiological Cardiology Research Center, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC (E.Z.S.); and Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York (M.M.S.).

Abstract

Background: Blacks have higher coronary heart disease (CHD) mortality compared with whites. However, a previous study suggests that nonfatal CHD risk may be lower for black versus white men. Methods: We compared fatal and nonfatal CHD incidence and CHD case-fatality among blacks and whites in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study (ARIC), the Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS), and the Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke study (REGARDS) by sex. Participants 45 to 64 years of age in ARIC (men=6479, women=8488) and REGARDS (men=5296, women=7822), and ≥65 years of age in CHS (men=1836, women=2790) and REGARDS (men=3381, women=4112), all without a history of CHD, were analyzed. Fatal and nonfatal CHD incidence was assessed from baseline (ARIC=1987–1989, CHS=1989–1990, REGARDS=2003–2007) through up to 11 years of follow-up. Results: Age-adjusted hazard ratios comparing black versus white men 45 to 64 years of age in ARIC and REGARDS were 2.09 (95% confidence interval, 1.42–3.06) and 2.11 (1.32–3.38), respectively, for fatal CHD, and 0.82 (0.64–1.05) and 0.94 (0.69–1.28), respectively, for nonfatal CHD. After adjustment for social determinants of health and cardiovascular risk factors, hazard ratios in ARIC and REGARDS were 1.19 (95% confidence interval, 0.74–1.92) and 1.09 (0.62–1.93), respectively, for fatal CHD, and 0.64 (0.47–0.86) and 0.67 (0.48–0.95), respectively, for nonfatal CHD. Similar patterns were present among men ≥65 years of age in CHS and REGARDS. Among women 45 to 64 years of age in ARIC and REGARDS, age-adjusted hazard ratios comparing blacks versus whites were 2.61 (95% confidence interval, 1.57–4.34) and 1.79 (1.06–3.03), respectively, for fatal CHD, and 1.47 (1.13–1.91) and 1.29 (0.91–1.83), respectively, for nonfatal CHD. After multivariable adjustment, hazard ratios in ARIC and REGARDS were 0.67 (95% confidence interval, 0.36–1.24) and 1.00 (0.54–1.85), respectively, for fatal CHD, and 0.70 (0.51–0.97) and 0.70 (0.46–1.06), respectively, for nonfatal CHD. Racial differences in CHD incidence were attenuated among older women. CHD case fatality was higher among black versus white men and women, and the difference remained similar after multivariable adjustment. Conclusions: After accounting for social determinants of health and risk factors, black men and women have similar risk for fatal CHD compared with white men and women, respectively. However, the risk for nonfatal CHD is consistently lower for black versus white men and women.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Reference59 articles.

1. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2016 Update

2. Coronary heart disease and stroke deaths: United States, 2009.;Gillespie CD;MMWR Surveill Summ,2013

3. National Heart Lung and Blood Institute. Morbidity & mortality: 2012 chartbook on cardiovascular lung and blood diseases. Bethesda MD: National Heart Lung and Blood Institute Office of Science and Technology; 2013. https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/research/reports/2012-mortality-chart-book.

4. Trends in the Age Adjusted Mortality from Acute ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the United States (1988–2004) Based on Race, Gender, Infarct Location and Comorbidities

5. Association of Race and Sex With Risk of Incident Acute Coronary Heart Disease Events

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3