Durable Clinical Effectiveness With Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents in the Femoropopliteal Artery

Author:

Dake Michael D.1,Ansel Gary M.1,Jaff Michael R.1,Ohki Takao1,Saxon Richard R.1,Smouse H. Bob1,Machan Lindsay S.1,Snyder Scott A.1,O’Leary Erin E.1,Ragheb Anthony O.1,Zeller Thomas1

Affiliation:

1. From Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA (M.D.D.); Department of Medicine, Ohio Health/Riverside Methodist Hospital, Columbus (G.M.A.); The Vascular Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston (M.R.J.); Department of Surgery, Jikei University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan (T.O.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Tri-City Medical Center, Oceanside, CA (R.R.S.); Department of Radiology, OSF St. Francis Medical Center, Peoria,...

Abstract

Background— This randomized controlled trial evaluated clinical durability of Zilver PTX, a paclitaxel-coated drug-eluting stent (DES), for femoropopliteal artery lesions. Outcomes compare primary DES versus percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), overall DES (primary and provisional) versus standard care (PTA and provisional Zilver bare metal stent [BMS]), and provisional DES versus provisional BMS. Methods and Results— Patients with symptomatic femoropopliteal artery disease were randomly assigned to DES (n=236) or PTA (n=238). Approximately 91% had claudication; 9% had critical limb ischemia. Patients experiencing acute PTA failure underwent secondary randomization to provisional BMS (n=59) or DES (n=61). The 1-year primary end points of event-free survival and patency showed superiority of primary DES in comparison with PTA; these results were sustained through 5 years. Clinical benefit (freedom from persistent or worsening symptoms of ischemia; 79.8% versus 59.3%, P <0.01), patency (66.4% versus 43.4%, P <0.01), and freedom from reintervention (target lesion revascularization, 83.1% versus 67.6%, P <0.01) for the overall DES group were superior to standard care in nonrandomized comparisons. Similarly, clinical benefit (81.8% versus 63.8%, P =0.02), patency (72.4% versus 53.0%, P =0.03), and freedom from target lesion revascularization (84.9% versus 71.6%, P =0.06) with provisional DES were improved over provisional BMS. These results represent >40% relative risk reduction for restenosis and target lesion revascularization through 5 years for the overall DES in comparison with standard care and for provisional DES in comparison with provisional BMS. Conclusions— The 5-year results from this large study provide long-term information previously unavailable regarding endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal artery disease. The Zilver PTX DES provided sustained safety and clinical durability in comparison with standard endovascular treatments. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00120406.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 454 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3