Affiliation:
1. Department of Nephrology Kidney Research CenterChang Gung Memorial HospitalLinkou Medical Center Taoyuan City Taiwan
2. Graduate Institute of Clinical Medical Science College of Medicine Chang Gung University Taoyuan Taiwan
3. Department of Cardiology Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Chiayi Taiwan
4. Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery Chang Gung Memorial HospitalLinkou Medical Center Taoyuan City Taiwan
5. Divison of Cardiovascular Medicine Arrhythmia Services SectionRhode Island HospitalWarren Alpert School of MedicineBrown University Providence RI
6. Division of Cardiology Chang Gung Memorial HospitalLinkou Medical Center Taoyuan City Taiwan
Abstract
Background
Benefits of patients with end‐stage renal disease and atrial fibrillation undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD) or hemodialysis are unknown.
Methods and Results
Patients undergoing dialysis were retrieved from Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database during 2001 to 2013 and separated into PD or hemodialysis. Primary outcomes were ischemic stroke/systemic embolism, major bleeding, and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). An inverse probability of treatment weighting based on propensity score was used to reduce the confounding. The risk of outcomes between PD and hemodialysis was compared using Cox proportional hazard model for fatal outcomes or Fine and Gray subdistribution hazard model which considered death a competing risk, respectively. A total of 7916 patients with end‐stage renal disease with atrial fibrillation undergoing PD or hemodialysis during 2001 to 2013 were identified. After exclusion criteria, 363 patients receiving PD and 5302 patients receiving hemodialysis were analyzed. At 1‐year follow‐up, the risk of ICH was significantly lower in the PD group compared with the hemodialysis group (0.2% versus 0.9%; subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR], 0.31; 95% CI, 0.17–0.57). At 3‐year follow‐up, the risks of major bleeding and ICH were significantly lower in the PD group compared with the hemodialysis group (major bleeding: 1.8% versus 3.2%; SHR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.53–0.87; ICH: 0.5% versus 2%; SHR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.21–0.48). At 5‐year follow‐up, ischemic stroke/systemic embolism, major bleeding, and ICH were significantly lower in the PD group compared with the hemodialysis group (ischemic stroke/systemic embolism: 12.4% versus 17.7%, SHR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.79–0.96; major bleeding: 2.6% versus 4.1%; SHR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.64–0.97; ICH: 0.5% versus 2.6%; SHR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.17–0.37).
Conclusions
In patients with end‐stage renal disease and atrial fibrillation, dialytic modalities by PD or hemodialysis impacted these patients differently. There were overall reduced ischemic stroke/systemic embolism, major bleeding, and ICH at 5‐year follow‐up in patients undergoing PD compared with hemodialysis.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Subject
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine