Standardizing the Definition and Analysis Methodology for Complete Coronary Artery Revascularization

Author:

Ali Ziad A.123ORCID,Horst Jennifer1,Gaba Prakriti3,Shaw Leslee J.4ORCID,Bangalore Sripal5ORCID,Hochman Judith S.5ORCID,Maron David J.6,Moses Jeffrey W.23ORCID,Alfonso Maria A.1,Madhavan Mahesh V.3,Dressler Ovidiu1,Reynolds Harmony5ORCID,Stone Gregg W.17ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Clinical Trials Center Cardiovascular Research Foundation New York NY

2. DeMatteis Cardiovascular Institute St. Francis Hospital Roslyn NY

3. New York‐Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Irving Medical Center New York NY

4. Department of Radiology NewYork‐Presbyterian Hospital and Weill Cornell Medicine New York NY

5. New York University Grossman School of Medicine New York NY

6. Department of Medicine Stanford University Stanford CA

7. The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York NY

Abstract

Abstract Guideline‐based medical therapy is the foundation of treatment for individuals with coronary artery disease. However, revascularization with either percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting may be beneficial in patients with acute coronary syndromes, refractory symptoms, or in other specific scenarios (eg, left main disease and heart failure). While the goal of percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting is to achieve complete revascularization, anatomical and ischemic definitions of complete revascularization and their methodology for assessment remain highly variable. Such lack of consensus invariably contributes to the absence of standardized approaches for invasive treatment of coronary artery disease. Herein, we propose a novel, comprehensive, yet pragmatic algorithm with both anatomical and ischemic parameters that aims to provide a systematic method to assess complete revascularization after percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting in both clinical practice and clinical trials.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Reference43 articles.

1. 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization

2. ACC/AATS/AHA/ASE/ASNC/SCAI/SCCT/STS 2017 appropriate use criteria for coronary revascularization in patients with stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons;Patel MR;J Am Coll Cardiol,2017

3. Complete versus incomplete coronary revascularization: definitions, assessment and outcomes

4. Complete versus culprit vessel percutaneous coronary intervention in multivessel disease: A randomized comparison

5. Angiographic Versus Functional Severity of Coronary Artery Stenoses in the FAME Study

Cited by 22 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3