Baroreflex Sensitivity in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

Author:

Miyoshi Miho1,Kondo Hidekazu1ORCID,Ishii Yumi1,Shinohara Tetsuji1,Yonezu Keisuke1,Harada Taisuke1,Sato Hiroki1ORCID,Yano Yudai1,Yoshimura Seiichiro1,Abe Ichitaro1,Shuto Takashi2,Akioka Hidefumi1,Teshima Yasushi1,Wada Tomoyuki2,Yufu Kunio1,Nakagawa Mikiko1,Anai Hirofumi2,Miyamoto Shinji2,Takahashi Naohiko1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cardiology and Clinical Examination Faculty of Medicine Oita University Yufu‐City Oita Japan

2. Department of Cardiovascular Surgery Faculty of Medicine Oita University Yufu‐City Oita Japan

Abstract

Background It has been reported that atrial fibrillation (AF) may contribute to impairment of baroreflex sensitivity (BRS). However, the difference of BRS between patients with persistent AF (PeAF) and those with paroxysmal AF (PAF) is unknown. We tested the hypothesis that patients with PeAF have a more impaired BRS compared with those with PAF. Methods and Results From October 2015 onwards, a total of 67 patients (14 women [20.9%]; mean age 65.2±10.1 years) with PAF (n=46, 68.7%) and PeAF (n=21, 31.3%), who underwent catheter ablation, were prospectively enrolled. The baseline BRS was evaluated during sinus rhythm. The baseline BRS in patients with PeAF was significantly lower than those with PAF (2.97 [0.52–6.62] ms/mm Hg versus 4.70 [2.36–8.37] ms/mm Hg, P =0.047). The BRS was significantly depressed after catheter ablation in all the patients (4.66 [1.80–7.37] ms/mm Hg versus 0.55 [−0.15 to 1.22] ms/mm Hg, P <0.001). However, the depression of BRS because of catheter ablation appeared attenuated in patients with PeAF when compared with those with PAF. The number of patients who did not show depression of BRS was significantly greater, that is, patients with PeAF (3/12, 25%) than those with PAF (0/46, 0%, P <0.01). Conclusions Our findings demonstrated that the baseline BRS was more depressed in patients with PeAF compared with PAF. Catheter ablation depressed BRS irrespective of the type of AF, with a greater effect in patients with PAF than PeAF.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3