Clinical Characteristics, Management Strategies, and Outcomes of Non–ST‐Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients With and Without Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Author:

Shoaib Ahmad1ORCID,Rashid Muhammad1,Berry Colin2ORCID,Curzen Nick3,Kontopantelis Evangelos4ORCID,Timmis Adam5,Ahmad Ayesha1,Kinnaird Tim6ORCID,Mamas Mamas A.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Keele Cardiovascular Research Group Centre for Prognosis Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences Keele University Stoke‐on‐Trent UK

2. Institute of Cardiovascular & Medical Sciences University of Glasgow UK

3. Cardiothoracic Department University Hospital Southampton & Faculty of MedicineUniversity of Southampton UK

4. Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences University of Manchester UK

5. Barts & the London School of Medicine and Dentistry Queen Mary University London London UK

6. University Hospital of Wales Cardiff UK

Abstract

Background There are limited data on the management strategies, temporal trends and clinical outcomes of patients who present with non–ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction and have a prior history of CABG. Methods and Results We identified 287 658 patients with non–ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction between 2010 and 2017 in the United Kingdom Myocardial Infarction National Audit Project database. Clinical and outcome data were analyzed by dividing into 2 groups by prior history of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG): group 1, no prior CABG (n=262 362); and group 2, prior CABG (n=25 296). Patients in group 2 were older, had higher GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) risk scores and burden of comorbid illnesses. More patients underwent coronary angiography (69% versus 63%) and revascularization (53% versus 40%) in group 1 compared with group 2. Adjusted odds of receiving inpatient coronary angiogram (odds ratio [OR], 0.91; 95% CI, 0.88–0.95; P <0.001) and revascularization (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.70–0.76; P <0.001) were lower in group 2 compared with group 1. Following multivariable logistic regression analyses, the OR of in‐hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (composite of inpatient death and reinfarction; OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.90–1.04; P =0.44), all‐cause mortality (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.88–1.04; P =0.31), reinfarction (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.89–1.17; P =0.78), and major bleeding (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.90–1.11; P =0.98) were similar across groups. Lower adjusted risk of inpatient mortality (OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.46–0.98; P =0.04) but similar risk of bleeding (OR,1.07; CI, 0.79–1.44; P =0.68) and reinfarction (OR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.81–1.57; P =0.47) were observed in group 2 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention compared with those managed medically. Conclusions In this national cohort, patients with non–ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction with prior CABG had a higher risk profile, but similar risk‐adjusted in‐hospital adverse outcomes compared with patients without prior CABG. Patients with prior CABG who received percutaneous coronary intervention had lower in‐hospital mortality compared with those who received medical management.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3