Need for Prophylactic Application of Verapamil in Transradial Coronary Procedures: A Randomized Trial

Author:

Hizoh Istvan1,Majoros Zsuzsanna1,Major Laszlo1,Gulyas Zalan1,Szabo Gabor1,Kerecsen Gabor1,Korda Andras1,Molnar Ferenc1,Kiss Robert Gabor1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cardiology, Military Hospital, Budapest, Hungary

Abstract

Background Verapamil is traditionally applied prophylactically in transradial procedures to prevent radial artery spasm. However, verapamil may have side effects and is contraindicated in some clinical settings. Methods and Results During an investigator‐initiated, randomized, double‐blind trial, we evaluated the need for preventive verapamil administration. After vascular access was established, patients received either 5 mg verapamil (n=297) or placebo (n=294). We compared the rate of access site conversions as primary end point using a superiority margin of 5%. Occurrence of code breaks (composite of conversions and unplanned use of verapamil), overall verapamil use, procedural and fluoroscopic times, contrast volume, and subjective pain were investigated as secondary end points. The rate of access site conversions was not different in the 2 arms (placebo 1.7% versus verapamil 0.7%, P =0.28, difference 1.0%, 95% CI for the difference −1.1% to 3.3%). Proportion of code breaks was similar in the 2 groups (3.4% versus 1.3%, P =0.11), whereas overall verapamil use was markedly lower in the placebo arm (2.0% versus 100%, P <0.0001). Procedural time (median [ IQR ] 16.0 minutes [9.0 to 30.0 minutes] versus 17.0 minutes [10.0 to 31.0 minutes], P =0.37), fluoroscopic time (4.4 minutes [2.1 to 9.6 minutes] versus 4.8 minutes [2.4 to 10.7 minutes], P =0.28), contrast volume (72.5 mL [48.0 to 146.0 mL] versus 75.5 mL [47.0 to 156.5 mL], P =0.74), and pain score ( P for trend=0.12) were comparable in the 2 groups. Conclusions The preventive use of verapamil may be unnecessary for transradial procedures. The omission of prophylactic verapamil may not only reduce the rate of potential complications related to the drug but also allow the safe extension of the transradial method to those with contraindications to verapamil. Clinical Trial Registration URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01402427.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Reference26 articles.

1. A Randomized Comparison of Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty by the Radial, Brachial and Femoral Approaches: The Access Study

2. Effect of transradial access on quality of life and cost of cardiac catheterization: A randomized comparison

3. Cost‐effectiveness of the radial versus femoral artery approach to diagnostic cardiac catheterization;Roussanov O;J Invasive Cardiol,2007

4. Factors predicting outcome of primary percutaneous coronary intervention: role of transradial access;Hizoh I;Eur Heart J,2010

5. Radial Versus Femoral Randomized Investigation in ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome

Cited by 26 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3