Growing Impact of Restenosis on the Surgical Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Disease

Author:

Jones Douglas W.1,Schanzer Andres2,Zhao Yuanyuan3,MacKenzie Todd A.4,Nolan Brian W.34,Conte Michael S.5,Goodney Philip P.34,

Affiliation:

1. Department of Surgery, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Weill‐Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY

2. Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA

3. Section of Vascular Surgery, Dartmouth‐Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH

4. The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Hanover, NH

5. Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA

Abstract

Background Patients with peripheral arterial disease often experience treatment failure from restenosis at the site of a prior peripheral endovascular intervention ( PVI ) or lower extremity bypass ( LEB ). The impact of these treatment failures on the utilization and outcomes of secondary interventions is poorly understood. Methods and Results In our regional vascular quality improvement collaborative, we compared 2350 patients undergoing primary infrainguinal LEB with 1154 patients undergoing secondary infrainguinal LEB ( LEB performed after previous revascularization in the index limb) between 2003 and 2011. The proportion of patients undergoing secondary LEB increased by 72% during the study period (22% of all LEBs in 2003 to 38% in 2011, P <0.001). In‐hospital outcomes, such as myocardial infarction, death, and amputation, were similar between primary and secondary LEB groups. However, in both crude and propensity‐weighted analyses, secondary LEB was associated with significantly inferior 1‐year outcomes, including major adverse limb event‐free survival (composite of death, new bypass graft, surgical bypass graft revision, thrombectomy/thrombolysis, or above‐ankle amputation; Secondary LEB MALE‐free survival = 61.6% vs primary LEB MALE‐free survival = 67.5%, P =0.002) and reintervention or amputation‐free survival (composite of death, reintervention, or above‐ankle amputation; Secondary LEB RAO‐free survival = 58.9% vs Primary LEB RAO‐free survival 64.1%, P =0.003). Inferior outcomes for secondary LEB were observed regardless of the prior failed treatment type ( PVI or LEB ). Conclusions In an era of increasing utilization of PVI , a growing proportion of patients undergo LEB in the setting of a prior failed PVI or surgical bypass. When caring for patients with peripheral arterial disease , physicians should recognize that first treatment failure ( PVI or LEB ) affects the success of subsequent revascularizations.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3