Sex-Associated Differences in the Clinical Outcomes of Left Ventricular Assist Device Recipients: Insights From Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support

Author:

Shetty Naman S.1ORCID,Parcha Vibhu1ORCID,Abdelmessih Peter2ORCID,Patel Nirav1,Hasnie Ammar A.2ORCID,Kalra Rajat3ORCID,Pandey Ambarish4ORCID,Breathett Khadijah5ORCID,Morris Alanna A.6ORCID,Arora Garima1,Arora Pankaj17ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Division of Cardiovascular Disease (N.S.S., V.P., N.P., G.A., P. Arora), University of Alabama at Birmingham.

2. Department of Medicine (P. Abdelmessih, A.A.H.), University of Alabama at Birmingham.

3. Cardiovascular Division, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (R.K.).

4. Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (A.P.).

5. Division of Cardiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis (K.B.).

6. Division of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA (A.A.M.).

7. Section of Cardiology, Birmingham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, AL (P. Arora).

Abstract

Background: Sex-associated differences in clinical outcomes among left ventricular assist device recipients in the United States have been recognized. However, an investigation of the social and clinical determinants of sex-associated differences is lacking. Methods: Left ventricular assist device receiving patients enrolled in Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support between 2005 and 2017 were included. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included heart transplantation and postimplantation adverse event rates. The cohort was stratified by the social subgroup of race and ethnicity (non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic Asian, and Hispanic), and clinical subgroups of device strategy (destination therapy, bridge to transplant, and bridge to candidacy), and implantation center volume (low [≤20 implants/y], medium [21–30 implants/y], and high [>30 implants/y]). A multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazard model was used to assess the risk of death and heart transplantation with prespecified interaction testing. Poisson regression was used to estimate adverse events by sex across the various subgroups. Results: Among 18 525 patients, there were 3968 (21.4%) females. Compared with their male counterparts, Hispanic (adjusted hazard ratio [HR adj ], 1.75 [1.23–2.47]) females had the highest risk of death followed by non-Hispanic White females (HR adj , 1.15 [1.07–1.25]; P interaction =0.02). Hispanic (HR adj , 0.60 [0.40–0.89]) females had the lowest cumulative incidence of heart transplantation followed by non-Hispanic Black females (HR adj , 0.76 [0.67–0.86]), and non-Hispanic White females (HR adj , 0.88 [0.80–0.96]) compared with their male counterparts ( P interaction <0.001). Compared with their male counterparts, females on the bridge to candidacy strategy (HR adj , 1.32 [1.18–1.48]) had the highest risk of death ( P interaction =0.01). The risk of death ( P interaction =0.44) and cumulative incidence of heart transplantation ( P interaction =0.40) did not vary by sex in the center volume subgroup. A higher incidence rate of adverse events after left ventricular assist device implantation was also seen in females compared with the males, overall, and across all subgroups. Conclusions: Among left ventricular assist device recipients, the risk of death, the cumulative incidence of heart transplantation, and adverse events differ by sex across the social and clinical subgroups.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3