Clinical Outcomes Associated With Acute Mechanical Circulatory Support Utilization in Heart Failure Related Cardiogenic Shock

Author:

Hernandez-Montfort Jaime1ORCID,Sinha Shashank S.2,Thayer Katherine L.3ORCID,Whitehead Evan H.4,Pahuja Mohit5ORCID,Garan Arthur Reshad6ORCID,Mahr Claudius7ORCID,Haywood Jillian L.3ORCID,Harwani Neil M.3ORCID,Schaeffer August8,Wencker Detlef9ORCID,Kanwar Manreet10ORCID,Vorovich Esther11ORCID,Abraham Jacob12,Burkhoff Daniel13ORCID,Kapur Navin K.3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston (J.H.-M.).

2. Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Inova Fairfax Medical Center, Falls Church, VA (S.S.S.).

3. The Cardiovascular Center, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA (K.L.T., J.L.H., N.M.H., N.K.K.).

4. Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston (E.H.W.).

5. Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, D.C. (M.P.).

6. Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA (A.R.G.).

7. University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle (C.M.).

8. The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston (A.S.).

9. Baylor Scott & White Advanced Heart Failure Clinic, Dallas, TX (D.W.).

10. Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA (M.K.).

11. Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL (E.V.).

12. Providence Heart Institute, Portland, OR (J.A.).

13. Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY (D.B.).

Abstract

Background: Cardiogenic shock occurring in the setting of advanced heart failure (HF-CS) is increasingly common. However, recent studies have focused almost exclusively on acute myocardial infarction-related CS. We sought to define clinical, hemodynamic, metabolic, and treatment parameters associated with clinical outcomes among patients with HF-CS, using data from the Cardiogenic Shock Working Group registry. Methods: Patients with HF-CS were identified from the multicenter Cardiogenic Shock Working Group registry and divided into 3 outcome categories assessed at hospital discharge: mortality, heart replacement therapy (HRT: durable ventricular assist device or orthotopic heart transplant), or native heart survival. Clinical characteristics, hemodynamic, laboratory parameters, drug therapies, acute mechanical circulatory support device (AMCS) utilization, and Society of Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention stages were compared across the 3 outcome cohorts. Results: Of the 712 patients with HF-CS identified, 180 (25.3%) died during their index admission, 277 (38.9%) underwent HRT (durable ventricular assist device or orthotopic heart transplant), and 255 (35.8%) experienced native heart survival without HRT. Patients who died had the highest right atrial pressure and heart rate and the lowest mean arterial pressure of the 3 outcome groups ( P <0.01 for all). Biventricular and isolated left ventricular congestion were common among patients who died or underwent HRT, respectively. Lactate, blood urea nitrogen, serum creatinine, and aspartate aminotransferase were highest in patients with HF-CS experiencing in-hospital death. Intraaortic balloon pump was the most commonly used AMCS device in the overall cohort and among patients receiving HRT. Patients receiving >1 AMCS device had the highest in-hospital mortality rate irrespective of the number of vasoactive drugs used. Mortality increased with deteriorating Society of Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention stages (stage B: 0%, stage C: 10.7%, stage D: 29.4%, stage E: 54.5%, 1-way ANOVA=<0.001). Conclusions: Patients with HF-CS experiencing in-hospital mortality had a high prevalence of biventricular congestion and markers of end-organ hypoperfusion. Substantial heterogeneity exists with use of AMCS in HF-CS with intraaortic balloon pump being the most common device used and high rates of in-hospital mortality after exposure to >1 AMCS device.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 49 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Clinical Presentation, Classification, and Outcomes of Cardiogenic Shock in Children;Journal of the American College of Cardiology;2024-02

2. Heart failure related cardiogenic shock: An ISHLT consensus conference content summary;The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation;2024-02

3. Revisiting nitrates use in pre-shock state of contemporary cardiogenic shock classification;Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine;2024-01-04

4. Cardiogenic Shock;Critical Care Clinics;2024-01

5. Unraveling heart failure cardiogenic shock profiles and pathways;European Journal of Heart Failure;2023-12-28

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3