Predicting the Risk of Right Ventricular Failure in Patients Undergoing Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation

Author:

Frankfurter Claudia1,Molinero Micaela2,Vishram-Nielsen Julie K.K.23ORCID,Foroutan Farid24,Mak Susanna5ORCID,Rao Vivek6,Billia Filio12ORCID,Orchanian-Cheff Ani7ORCID,Alba Ana Carolina24ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Canada (C.F., F.B.).

2. Heart Failure and Transplant Program, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre (M.M., J.K.K.V.-N., F.F., F.B., A.C.A.), University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.

3. Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Denmark (J.K.K.V.-N.).

4. Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada (F.F., A.C.A.).

5. Division of Cardiology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Canada (S.M.).

6. Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre (V.R.), University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.

7. Library and Information Services (A.O.-C.), University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.

Abstract

Background: Right ventricular failure (RVF) is a cause of major morbidity and mortality after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. It is, therefore, integral to identify patients who may benefit from biventricular support early post-LVAD implantation. Our objective was to explore the performance of risk prediction models for RVF in adult patients undergoing LVAD implantation. Methods: A systematic search was performed on Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from inception until August 2019 for all relevant studies. Performance was assessed by discrimination (via C statistic) and calibration if reported. Study quality was assessed using the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool criteria. Results: After reviewing 3878 citations, 25 studies were included, featuring 20 distinctly derived models. Five models were derived from large multicenter cohorts: the European Registry for Patients With Mechanical Circulatory Support, Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support, Kormos, Pittsburgh Bayesian, and Mechanical Circulatory Support Research Network RVF models. Seventeen studies (68%) were conducted in cohorts implanted with continuous-flow LVADs exclusively. The definition of RVF as an outcome was heterogenous among models. Seven derived models (28%) were validated in at least 2 cohorts, reporting limited discrimination (C-statistic range, 0.53–0.65). Calibration was reported in only 3 studies and was variable. Conclusions: Existing RVF prediction models exhibit heterogeneous derivation and validation methodologies, varying definitions of RVF, and are mostly derived from single centers. Validation studies of these prediction models demonstrate poor-to-modest discrimination. Newer models are derived in cohorts implanted with continuous-flow LVADs exclusively and exhibit modest discrimination. Derivation of enhanced discriminatory models and their validations in multicenter cohorts is needed.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3