Practice Patterns and Patient Outcomes After Widespread Adoption of Remote Heart Failure Care

Author:

Yuan Neal1ORCID,Botting Patrick G.1,Elad Yaron12,Miller Shaun J.32,Cheng Susan1ORCID,Ebinger Joseph E.1,Kittleson Michelle M.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Smidt Heart Institute (N.Y., P.G.B., Y.E., S.C., J.E.E., M.M.K.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.

2. Division of Informatics, Department of Biomedical Sciences (Y.E., S.J.M.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.

3. Department of Medicine (S.J.M.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.

Abstract

Background: An unprecedented shift to remote heart failure outpatient care occurred during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Given challenges inherent to remote care, we studied whether remote visits (video or telephone) were associated with different patient usage, clinician practice patterns, and outcomes. Methods: We included all ambulatory cardiology visits for heart failure at a multisite health system from April 1, 2019, to December 31, 2019 (pre-COVID) or April 1, 2020, to December 31, 2020 (COVID era), resulting in 10 591 pre-COVID in-person, 7775 COVID-era in-person, 1009 COVID-era video, and 2322 COVID-era telephone visits. We used multivariable logistic and Cox proportional hazards regressions with propensity weighting and patient clustering to study ordering practices and outcomes. Results: Compared with in-person visits, video visits were used more often by younger (mean 64.7 years [SD 14.5] versus 74.2 [14.1]), male (68.3% versus 61.4%), and privately insured (45.9% versus 28.9%) individuals ( P <0.05 for all). Remote visits were more frequently used by non-White patients (35.8% video, 37.0% telephone versus 33.2% in-person). During remote visits, clinicians were less likely to order diagnostic testing (odds ratio, 0.20 [0.18–0.22] video versus in-person, 0.18 [0.17–0.19] telephone versus in-person) or prescribe β-blockers (0.82 [0.68–0.99], 0.35 [0.26–0.47]), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (0.69 [0.50–0.96], 0.48 [0.35–0.66]), or loop diuretics (0.67 [0.53–0.85], 0.45 [0.37–0.55]). During telephone visits, clinicians were less likely to prescribe ACE (angiotensin-converting enzyme) inhibitor/ARB (angiotensin receptor blockers)/ARNIs (angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors; 0.54 [0.40–0.72]). Telephone visits but not video visits were associated with higher rates of 90-day mortality (1.82 [1.14–2.90]) and nonsignificant trends towards higher rates of 90-day heart failure emergency department visits (1.34 [0.97–1.86]) and hospitalizations (1.36 [0.98–1.89]). Conclusions: Remote visits for heart failure care were associated with reduced diagnostic testing and guideline-directed medical therapy prescription. Telephone but not video visits were associated with increased 90-day mortality.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 26 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3