Assessment of Long-Term Effects of Irbesartan on Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction as Measured by the Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire in the Irbesartan in Heart Failure With Preserved Systolic Function (I-PRESERVE) Trial

Author:

Rector Thomas S.1,Carson Peter E.1,Anand Inder S.1,McMurray John J.1,Zile Michael R.1,McKelvie Robert S.1,Komajda Michel1,Kuskowski Michael1,Massie Barry M.1,

Affiliation:

1. From the Department of Veterans Affairs Health Care System and Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN (T.S.R., I.S.A.); the Department of Veterans Affairs Health Care System and Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC (P.E.C.); British Heart Foundation Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom (J.J.M.); Ralph H. Johnson Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center and The Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (M.R...

Abstract

Background— The Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) was used in a large, multinational, randomized, placebo-controlled trial to measure adverse effects of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HF-PEF) on patients' lives and the effects of irbesartan. Methods and Results— Patients with symptomatic HF-PEF were randomly assigned to irbesartan (up to 300 mg daily) or placebo. The MLHFQ was administered at baseline (n=3605), month 6 (n=3137), month 14 (n=2904), and the end of study (median, 56 months, n=2205). Baseline MLHFQ scores of 43±21 indicated that HF-PEF had a substantial adverse effects. Estimated retest reliability was 0.80. Baseline MLHFQ scores were associated with other measures of the severity of heart failure including symptoms, signs of congestion, cardiac structure, and time to hospitalizations or deaths attributed to heart failure. Slight improvement in shortness of breath or fatigue was associated with significant improvement in MLHFQ scores (−5.9 and −5.0, P <0.0001). Compared with placebo, further improvement in MLHFQ scores was not observed with irbesartan after 6 months (mean adjusted difference, 0.4; 95% confidence interval, −0.8 to 1.7), 14 months (0.5; 95% confidence interval, −0.9 to 1.8), or the end of study (2.0; 95% confidence interval, −4.1 to 0.01). Conclusions— The MLHFQ scores are a reliable, valid, and sensitive measure of the adverse impact of HF-PEF on patients' lives. Irbesartan did not substantially improve MLHFQ scores during a long period of follow-up. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00095238.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 64 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3