Smooth Muscle Tone and Arterial Wall Viscosity

Abstract

Abstract —The relationships between steady and pulsatile pressures, smooth muscle tone, and arterial viscoelastic behavior remain a matter of controversy. We previously showed that arterial wall viscosity (AWV) was 3-fold lower in vivo than in vitro and suggested that in vivo active mechanisms could minimize intrinsic AWV to improve the efficiency of heart-vessel coupling energy balance. The aim of the present study was to determine the role of smooth muscle tone on AWV, under various levels of steady and pulsatile pressures, both in vivo and in vitro. AWV of rat abdominal aorta was studied first in vivo after bolus injections of phenylephrine (PE) or sodium nitroprusside (SNP), then in vitro in response to PE or SNP. In vitro, arterial segments were submitted first to steady pressure (0 to 200 mm Hg) by increments of 20 mm Hg, then to increasing levels of pulse pressure (20 to 50 mm Hg) at various mean arterial pressures (75 to 150 mm Hg). AWV was quantified as the area of the pressure/diameter relationship hysteresis, issued from the simultaneous measurements of pressure (Millar micromanometer) and diameter (NIUS echotracking device). In vivo, AWV increased after PE and decreased after SNP, in parallel with pressure changes. In vitro, AWV was not significantly influenced by PE and SNP. After both PE and SNP, AWV increased with pulse pressure but was not influenced by mean arterial pressure. At any given pulse pressure, AWV was higher in vitro than in vivo. The relation between AWV and pulse pressure was significantly steeper in vitro than in vivo. These results show that AWV is strongly influenced by steady and pulsatile mechanical load but not by smooth muscle tone, both in vivo and in vitro. Factors other than sustained smooth muscle activation should be explored to explain the minimization of AWV in vivo compared with intrinsic in vitro values.