Transradial Access Results in Faster Recanalization in Left Anterior Circulation Stroke with Bovine Arch Anatomy

Author:

Maud Alberto1ORCID,Moreno Jorge H.1,Sheriff Faheem G.1,Chaudry Mohammad Rauf1,Gupta Vikas1,Khatri Rakesh1,Rodriguez Gustavo J.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurology, Texas Tech Health Sciences Center El Paso Paul L Foster School of Medicine El Paso TX

Abstract

Background We compared technical and clinical outcomes of transradial (TRA) versus transfemoral (TFA) access for mechanical thrombectomy of acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion in the left anterior cerebral circulation of bovine origin. Methods A single‐center retrospective review of a prospectively maintained neurointerventional database from a large volume service in a tertiary academic center. Procedural metrics, technical, and clinical outcomes data were collected and analyzed for patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy presenting with acute ischemic stroke and large vessel occlusion in the left anterior circulation of bovine origin. Clinical and procedural outcomes included the average number of passes, single first effective pass, rate of successful recanalization (thrombolysis in cerebral infarction score≥2b), 3‐month disability modified Rankin scale scores, time from skin puncture to microcatheter placement, and recanalization. Results Between January 2018 and January 2021, 26 patients (TRA=13, TFA=13) underwent mechanical thrombectomy. The TRA cohort had a significantly shorter time in minutes for skin puncture to microcatheter placement (TRA: 17.0±5.8 versus TFA: 35.4±20.5; P =0.0001), shorter skin puncture to recanalization (TRA: 34.0±15.6 versus TFA: 58.1±34.6; P =0.01), and shorter total fluoroscopy time (TRA: 13.8±9.4 versus TFA: 29.5±18.0; P =0.03). The 3‐month modified Rankin scale score of (0–1) was higher in the TRA group (38.5% versus 7.69%; P =0.06). Conclusions In patients with large vessel occlusion in the left anterior cerebral circulation of bovine origin, right TRA access permits more direct navigation and provides a stable platform resulting in shorter procedure times and faster recanalization with potential for improved functional outcomes.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Reference26 articles.

1. A comparison of radial versus femoral artery access for acute stroke interventions;Khanna O;J Neurosurg.,2020

2. Radial first or patient first: a case series and meta‐analysis of transradial versus transfemoral access for acute ischemic stroke intervention;Siddiqui AH;J Neurointerv Surg.,2021

3. Transradial access results in faster skin puncture to reperfusion time than transfemoral access in posterior circulation mechanical thrombectomy;Maud A;J Vasc Interv Neurol,2019

4. Transradial versus transfemoral access for anterior circulation mechanical thrombectomy: analysis of 375 consecutive cases;Phillips TJ;Stroke Vasc Neurol.,2020

5. Transradial versus transfemoral access for anterior circulation mechanical thrombectomy: comparison of technical and clinical outcomes;Chen SH;J Neurointerv Surg.,2019

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3