Affiliation:
1. From the Lipid and Lipoprotein Laboratory, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation (P.A., C.K.-G.), Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, and the Atherosclerosis Research Unit, Division of Cardiology, Departments of Medicine and Preventive Medicine (W.J.M., H.N.H.), University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Abstract
Abstract
We have demonstrated previously in a subset of Monitored Atherosclerosis Regression Study (MARS) subjects with hypercholesterolemia (190 to 295 mg/dL) and documented coronary artery disease that lovastatin significantly reduces cholesterol-rich lipoprotein B (LpB) but has little effect on complex, triglyceride-rich apolipoprotein (apo) B–containing LpB
c
(the sum of LpB:C, LpB:C:E and LpA-II:B:C:D:E) particles defined by their apolipoprotein composition. This differential effect of lovastatin on apoB-containing lipoprotein families offered the opportunity to determine in the same subset of MARS subjects the independent relationship of LpB and LpB
c
with the progression of coronary artery disease. Subjects randomized to either lovastatin (40 mg twice daily) or matching placebo were evaluated by coronary angiography before randomization and after 2 years of treatment, and the overall coronary status was judged by a coronary global change score. In the lovastatin-treated group, there were 22 nonprogressors (69%) and 10 progressors (31%), while in the placebo group 13 subjects (42%) were nonprogressors and 18 (58%) were progressors (
P
<.03). In the lovastatin-treated group, lipid and lipoprotein parameters did not differ between progressors and nonprogressors except for LpB
c
and LpA-II:B:C:D:E particle levels, which were statistically higher in progressors (
P
=.02). In the placebo-treated group, progressors differed from nonprogressors by having significantly higher levels of triglycerides (
P
=.03) and apoC-III in VLDL+LDL (
P
=.05), the characteristic constituents of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins. In the placebo- and lovastatin-treated groups combined, progressors had significantly higher on-trial levels of triglycerides (
P
=.003), VLDL cholesterol (
P
=.005), apoC-III in VLDL+LDL (
P
=.008), apoC-III (
P
=.01), apoB (
P
=.03), and total cholesterol (
P
=.04) than nonprogressors. Even after adjustment for treatment group, progressors in the combined placebo- and lovastatin-treated groups had significantly higher levels of LpB
c
, LpA-II:B:C:D:E, triglycerides, and apoC-III in VLDL+LDL than nonprogressors. Progressors in the placebo-treated, lovastatin-treated, and combined treatment groups had lower levels of LpA-I but not LpA-I:A-II than nonprogressors, and this difference reached statistical significance (
P
=.047) in the combined sample adjusted for treatment group. Results of this study show that elevated levels of triglyceride-rich LpB
c
in general and LpA-II:B:C:D:E in particular contribute significantly to the progression of coronary artery disease. Furthermore, they provide additional evidence for the potentially protective role of LpA-I particles in the atherogenic process and suggest that apolipoprotein-defined lipoprotein families may be more specific prognosticators of coronary artery atherosclerosis progression than lipids and apolipoproteins.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Subject
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine