Behavior of Extracranial‐to‐Intracranial Extended Arterial Dissections of the Vertebral Artery

Author:

Park So Young1ORCID,Lee Jin Soo1ORCID,Kim Min1ORCID,Jung Woo Sang2ORCID,Choi Jin Wook2ORCID,Hong Ji Man1ORCID,Lee Seong‐Joon1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurology Ajou University School of Medicine, Ajou University Medical Center Suwon South Korea

2. Department of Radiology Ajou University School of Medicine, Ajou University Medical Center Suwon South Korea

Abstract

Background Vertebral artery dissections (VADs) may extend from the extracranial to the intracranial vasculature (e+iVAD). We evaluated how the characteristics of e+iVAD differed from those of intracranial VAD (iVAD). Methods and Results From 2002 to 2019, among consecutive patients with cervicocephalic dissection, those with iVAD and e+iVAD were included, and their clinical characteristics were compared. In patients with unruptured dissections, a composite clinical outcome of subsequent ischemic events, subsequent hemorrhagic stroke, or mortality was evaluated. High‐resolution magnetic resonance images were analyzed to evaluate intracranial remodeling index. Among 347 patients, 51 (14.7%) had e+iVAD and 296 (85.3%) had iVAD. The hemorrhagic presentation occurred solely in iVAD (0.0% versus 19.3%), whereas e+iVAD exhibited higher ischemic presentation (84.3% versus 27.4%; P <0.001). e+iVAD predominantly presented steno‐occlusive morphology (88.2% versus 27.7%) compared with dilatation patterns (11.8% versus 72.3%; P <0.001) of iVAD. The ischemic presentation was significantly associated with e+iVAD (iVAD as a reference; adjusted odds ratio, 3.97 [95% CI, 1.67–9.45]; P =0.002]). Patients with unruptured VAD showed no differences in the rate of composite clinical outcome between the groups (log‐rank, P =0.996). e+iVAD had a lower intracranial remodeling index (1.4±0.3 versus 1.6±0.4; P <0.032) and a shorter distance from dural entry to the maximal dissecting segment (6.9±8.4 versus 15.7±7.4; P <0.001). Conclusions e+iVAD is associated with lower rates of hemorrhages and higher rates of ischemia than iVAD at the time of admission. This may be explained by a lower intracranial remodeling index and less deep intrusion of the dissecting segment into the intracranial space.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3