Sex Differences in Receipt of Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Considering Neighborhood Racial and Ethnic Composition

Author:

Blewer Audrey L.12ORCID,Starks Monique A.3ORCID,Malta‐Hansen Carolina4ORCID,Sasson Comilla5ORCID,Ong Marcus Eng Hock67ORCID,Al‐Araji Rabab8,McNally Bryan F.89ORCID,Viera Anthony J.12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Family Medicine and Community Health Duke University Durham NC

2. Department of Population Health Sciences Duke University Durham NC

3. Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Durham NC

4. Department of Cardiology Copenhagen University Hospital Gentofte Hellerup Denmark

5. Department of Emergency Medicine University of Colorado Denver CO

6. Health Services and Systems Research Duke–National University of Singapore Medical School Singapore

7. Department of Emergency Medicine Singapore General Hospital Singapore

8. Rollins School of Public Health Emory University Atlanta GA

9. Department of Emergency Medicine Emory University School of Medicine Atlanta GA

Abstract

Background Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (B‐CPR) and defibrillation for out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) vary by sex, with women being less likely to receive these interventions in public. It is unknown whether sex differences persist when considering neighborhood racial and ethnic composition. We examined the odds of receiving B‐CPR stratified by location and neighborhood. We hypothesized that women in predominantly Black neighborhoods will have a lower odds of receiving B‐CPR. Methods and Results We conducted a retrospective study using the Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival (CARES). Neighborhoods were classified by census tract. We modeled the odds of receipt of B‐CPR (primary outcome), automatic external defibrillation application, and survival to hospital discharge (secondary outcomes) by sex. CARES collected 457 621 arrests (2013–2019); after appropriate exclusion, 309 662 were included. Women who had public OHCA had a 14% lower odds of receiving B‐CPR (odds ratio [OR], 0.86 [95% CI, 0.82–0.89]), but effect modification was not seen by neighborhood ( P =not significant). In predominantly Black neighborhoods, women who had public OHCA had a 13% lower odds of receiving B‐CPR (adjusted OR, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.76–0.98]) and 12% lower odds of receiving automatic external defibrillation application (adjusted OR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.78–0.99]). In predominantly Hispanic neighborhoods, women who had public OHCA were less likely to receive B‐CPR (adjusted OR, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.73–0.96]) and less likely to receive automatic external defibrillation application (adjusted OR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.64–0.87]). Conclusions Women with public OHCA have a decreased likelihood of receiving B‐CPR and automatic external defibrillation application. Findings did not differ significantly according to neighborhood composition. Despite this, our work has implications for considering strategies to reduce disparities around bystander response.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3