Affiliation:
1. Department of Cardiology Copenhagen University Hospital—Rigshospitalet Copenhagen Denmark
2. Department of Clinical Medicine University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
3. Department of Cardiology Copenhagen University Hospital—Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Copenhagen Denmark
4. Department of Cardiology Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus Denmark
5. Department of Clinical Medicine Aarhus University Aarhus Denmark
6. Department of Cardiology Copenhagen University Hospital—Herlev and Gentofte Hellerup Denmark
7. Department of Cardiology Odense University Hospital Svendborg Denmark
8. Department of Cardiology Aalborg University Hospital Aalborg Denmark
9. Department of Cardiology Zealand University Hospital Roskilde Denmark
10. Department of Cardiology Nordsjællands Hospital Hillerød Denmark
11. Department of Public Health University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
Abstract
Background
Patients with heart failure and chronic kidney disease (CKD) may have an increased risk of death from causes competing with arrhythmic death, which could have implications for the efficacy of implantable cardioverter‐defibrillators (ICDs). We examined the long‐term effects of primary prophylactic ICD implantation, compared with usual care, according to baseline CKD status in an extended follow‐up study of DANISH (Danish Study to Assess the Efficacy of ICDs in Patients With Nonischemic Systolic Heart Failure on Mortality).
Methods and Results
In the DANISH trial, 1116 patients with nonischemic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction were randomized to receive an ICD (N=556) or usual care (N=550). Outcomes were analyzed according to CKD status (estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥/<60 mL/min per 1.73 m
2
) at baseline. In total, 1113 patients had an available estimated glomerular filtration rate measurement at baseline (median estimated glomerular filtration rate 73 mL/min per 1.73 m
2
), and 316 (28%) had CKD. During a median follow‐up of 9.5 years, ICD implantation, compared with usual care, did not reduce the rate of all‐cause mortality (no CKD, HR, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.64–1.04]; CKD, HR, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.75–1.38];
P
interaction
=0.31) or cardiovascular death (no CKD, HR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.58–1.03]; CKD, HR, 1.05 [95% CI, 0.73–1.51];
P
interaction
=0.20), irrespective of baseline CKD status. Similarly, baseline CKD status did not modify the beneficial effects of ICD implantation on sudden cardiovascular death (no CKD, HR, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.32–1.00]; CKD, HR, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.34–1.24];
P
interaction
=0.70).
Conclusions
ICD implantation, compared with usual care, did not reduce the overall mortality rate, but it did reduce the rate of sudden cardiovascular death, regardless of baseline kidney function in patients with nonischemic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.
Registration
URL:
https://www.clinicaltrials.gov
; Unique identifier: NCT00542945.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)