Circulating Cardiovascular Biomarkers in Cancer Therapeutics‐Related Cardiotoxicity: Review of Critical Challenges, Solutions, and Future Directions

Author:

Murtagh Gillian1ORCID,Januzzi James L.2ORCID,Scherrer‐Crosbie Marielle3ORCID,Neilan Tomas G.2ORCID,Dent Susan4ORCID,Ho Jennifer E.5ORCID,Appadurai Vinesh67,McDermott Ray8ORCID,Akhter Nausheen6ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Medical Affairs, Core Diagnostics Abbott Lake Forest IL USA

2. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School Boston MA USA

3. Division of Cardiology The Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA USA

4. Duke Cancer Institute, Department of Medicine Duke University Durham NC USA

5. CardioVascular Institute and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine Beth Israel Deaconess Medicine Center Boston MA USA

6. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Chicago IL USA

7. School of Medicine The University of Queensland St Lucia Queensland Australia

8. Medical Oncology St. Vincent’s University Hospital Dublin Ireland

Abstract

ABSTRACT Cardiotoxicity is a growing concern in the oncology population. Transthoracic echocardiography and multigated acquisition scans have been used for surveillance but are relatively insensitive and resource intensive. Innovative imaging techniques are constrained by cost and availability. More sensitive, cost‐effective cardiotoxicity surveillance strategies are needed. Circulating cardiovascular biomarkers could provide a sensitive, low‐cost solution. Biomarkers such as troponins, natriuretic peptides (NPs), novel upstream signals of oxidative stress, inflammation, and fibrosis as well as panomic technologies have shown substantial promise, and guidelines recommend baseline measurement of troponins and NPs in all patients receiving potential cardiotoxins. Nonetheless, supporting evidence has been hampered by several limitations. Previous reviews have provided valuable perspectives on biomarkers in cancer populations, but important analytic aspects remain to be examined in depth. This review provides comprehensive assessment of critical challenges and solutions in this field, with focus on analytical issues relating to biomarker measurement and interpretation. Examination of evidence pertaining to common and serious forms of cardiotoxicity reveals that improved study designs incorporating larger, more diverse populations, registry‐based approaches, and refinement of current definitions are key. Further efforts to harmonize biomarker methodologies including centralized biobanking and analyses, novel decision limits, and head‐to‐head comparisons are needed. Multimarker algorithms incorporating machine learning may allow rapid, personalized risk assessment. These improvements will not only augment the predictive value of circulating biomarkers in cardiotoxicity but may elucidate both direct and indirect relationships between cardiovascular disease and cancer, allowing biomarkers a greater role in the development and success of novel anticancer therapies.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3