Association of Real‐Time Feedback and Cardiopulmonary‐Resuscitation Quality Delivered by Ambulance Personnel for Out‐of‐Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Author:

Lyngby Rasmus Meyer12ORCID,Quinn Tom2ORCID,Oelrich Roselil Maria1,Nikoletou Dimitra2ORCID,Gregers Mads Christian Tofte13ORCID,Kjølbye Julie Samsøe13ORCID,Ersbøll Annette Kjær14ORCID,Folke Fredrik153ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Copenhagen Emergency Medical Services Copenhagen Denmark

2. Kingston University and St. Georges University of London London United Kingdom

3. Department of Clinical Medicine University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark

4. National Institute of Public Health University of Southern Denmark Copenhagen Denmark

5. Herlev Gentofte University Hospital Copenhagen Denmark

Abstract

Background High‐quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is associated with improved survival from out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest and includes chest compression depth, chest compression rate, and chest compression fraction within international guideline recommendations. Previous studies have demonstrated divergent results of real‐time feedback on CPR performance and patient outcomes. This study investigated the association between emergency medical service CPR quality and real‐time CPR feedback for out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest. Methods and Results This study collected out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest data within the Capital Region of Denmark and compared CPR quality delivered by ambulance personnel. Data were collected in 2 consecutive phases from October 2018 to February 2020. Median chest compression depth was 6.0 cm (no feedback) and 5.9 cm (real‐time feedback) ( P =0.852). Corresponding proportion of guideline‐compliant chest compressions for depth was 16.6% and 28.7%, respectively ( P <0.001). Median chest compression rate per minute was 111 and 109 ( P <0.001), respectively. Corresponding guideline adherence proportion for compression rate was 65.4% compared with 80.4% ( P <0.001), respectively. Chest compression fraction was 78.9% compared with 81.9% ( P <0.001), respectively. The combination of guideline‐compliant chest compression depth and chest compression rate simultaneously was 8.5% (no feedback) versus 18.8% (feedback) ( P <0.001). Improvements were not significant for return of spontaneous circulation (odds ratio [OR], 1.08 [95% CI, 0.84–1.39]), sustained return of spontaneous circulation (OR, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.77–1.31]), or survival to hospital discharge (OR, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.64–1.30]). Conclusions Real‐time feedback was associated with improved guideline compliance for chest compression depth, rate, and fraction but not return of spontaneous circulation, sustained return of spontaneous circulation, or survival to hospital discharge. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT04152252.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3