Culprit‐Only Versus Immediate Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicating Advanced Cardiogenic Shock Requiring Venoarterial‐Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

Author:

Choi Ki Hong1ORCID,Yang Jeong Hoon1ORCID,Park Taek Kyu1ORCID,Lee Joo Myung1ORCID,Song Young Bin1ORCID,Hahn Joo‐Yong1ORCID,Choi Seung‐Hyuk1ORCID,Ahn Chul‐Min2ORCID,Yu Cheol Woong3ORCID,Park Ik Hyun4ORCID,Jang Woo Jin5ORCID,Kim Hyun‐Joong6ORCID,Bae Jang‐Whan7ORCID,Kwon Sung Uk8ORCID,Lee Hyun‐Jong9ORCID,Lee Wang Soo10ORCID,Jeong Jin‐Ok11ORCID,Park Sang‐Don12ORCID,Kang Tae‐Soo13ORCID,Gwon Hyeon‐Cheol1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine Seoul Republic of Korea

2. Division of Cardiology, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital Yonsei University College of Medicine Seoul South Korea

3. Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine Korea University Anam Hospital Seoul Republic of Korea

4. Department of Cardiology Samsung Changwon Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine Changwon South Korea

5. Department of Cardiology Ewha Woman’s University Seoul Hospital, Ehwa Woman’s University School of Medicine Seoul Republic of Korea

6. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine Konkuk University Medical Center Seoul South Korea

7. Department of Internal Medicine Chungbuk National University College of Medicine Cheongju South Korea

8. Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine Ilsan Paik Hospital, University of Inje College of Medicine Seoul South Korea

9. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine Sejong General Hospital Bucheon South Korea

10. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine Chung‐Ang University Hospital Seoul South Korea

11. Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine Chungnam National University Hospital Daejeon Republic of Korea

12. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine Inha University Hospital Incheon South Korea

13. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine Dankook University Hospital, Dankook University College of Medicine Cheonan South Korea

Abstract

Background Despite the benefit of culprit‐only percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the CULPRIT‐SHOCK (Culprit Lesion Only PCI Versus Multi‐vessel PCI in Cardiogenic Shock) trial, the optimal revascularization strategy for refractory cardiogenic shock (CS) requiring mechanical circulatory support devices remains controversial. This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes between the culprit‐only and immediate multivessel PCI strategies in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by CS who underwent venoarterial‐extracorporeal membrane oxygenation before revascularization. Methods and Results This study included patient‐pooled data from the RESCUE (Retrospective and Prospective Observational Study to Investigate Clinical Outcomes and Efficacy of Left Ventricular Assist Devices for Korean Patients With Cardiogenic Shock) and SMC‐ECMO (Samsung Medical Center–Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation) registries. A total of 315 patients with acute myocardial infarction with multivessel disease who underwent venoarterial‐extracorporeal membrane oxygenation before revascularization attributable to refractory CS were included in this analysis. The study population was classified into culprit‐only versus immediate multivessel PCI according to nonculprit lesion treatment strategies. The primary end point was 30‐day mortality or renal‐replacement therapy, and the key secondary end point was 12‐month follow‐up mortality. Among the study population, 175 (55.6%) underwent culprit‐only PCI and 140 (44.4%) underwent immediate multivessel PCI. Compared with culprit‐only PCI, immediate multivessel PCI was associated with significantly lower risks of 30‐day mortality or renal‐replacement therapy (68.0% versus 54.3%; P =0.018) and all‐cause mortality during 12 months of follow‐up (59.5% versus 47.5%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.689 [95% CI, 0.506–0.939]; P =0.018) in patients with acute myocardial infarction and CS who underwent venoarterial‐extracorporeal membrane oxygenation before revascularization. These results were also consistent in the 99 pairs of propensity score–matched population (60.6% versus 43.6%; HR, 0.622 [95% CI, 0.420–0.922]; P =0.018). Conclusions Among patients with acute myocardial infarction with multivessel disease complicated by advanced CS requiring venoarterial‐extracorporeal membrane oxygenation before revascularization, immediate multivessel PCI was associated with lower incidences of 30‐day mortality or renal replacement therapy and 12‐month follow‐up mortality, compared with culprit‐only PCI. Registration Information clinicaltrials.gov . Identifier: NCT02985008.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3